2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualizing certification and auditing: Soy certification and access of local communities to land and water in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good part of the imported soya is directly handled and exported at the Port of Rotterdam or exported after having been processed. Moreover, despite the efforts of soya certification standards such as the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), some report that these initiatives are not effective in "protecting the rights and access of local communities to land and water" [30].…”
Section: Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good part of the imported soya is directly handled and exported at the Port of Rotterdam or exported after having been processed. Moreover, despite the efforts of soya certification standards such as the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), some report that these initiatives are not effective in "protecting the rights and access of local communities to land and water" [30].…”
Section: Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that the new agricultural and deforestation policies reach small farmers, it will be the punitive side of them. Local communities have lost access to land and water with the soy market initiatives (Schilling-Vaca-Flor et al 2021).…”
Section: Stage 3: Institutional and Political Disarray 2011-2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For soybeans, the agreement also reduced rates of deforestation for soy cultivation in the Amazon, but did so by pushing it to the Cerrado region (Lima et al 2019, Schilling-Vaca-Flor et al 2021. While far from classic climate institutions, the Soy and Beef Moratoria are arguably part of a broader polycentric understanding of climate institutions, and helped to compensate for the declining state role.…”
Section: Stage 3: Institutional and Political Disarray 2011-2021mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concretely, this means that soy farmers must be able to prove that they have set aside a portion of their property for conservation purposes and register the agricultural land and its legal reserve in the CAR. However, as the legal reserve does not necessarily need to be adjacent of the farmer's agricultural land, in practice many farmers declare to hold conservation areas in places that are used or inhabited by local communities and family farmers who often do not possess land titles, thereby contributing to the dispossession of vulnerable actors from their lands and livelihoods [16,46] (interview with Brazilian grassroots organization, 13 August 2018; interview with staff from Brazil's public prosecutor office, 17 August 2018). In turn, in many instances, displaced people end up at the settlement frontier, entering remaining forests, the land of Indigenous peoples or protected areas [48].…”
Section: Environmental and Human Rights Impacts And Their Interaction In Brazil's Soy And Beef Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current governance arrangements have been insufficient to regulate global supply chains and to hold corporations accountable for their human rights and environmental performance beyond the borders of their home states [12][13][14]. There has been an absence of related international conventions or treaties and the shortcomings of private and voluntary approaches such as certification standards and corporate commitments have become ever more evident [15,16]. In turn, domestic policies in the producing countries have often been inappropriate for protecting the environment and human rights from the negative externalities of globalized business activities [6,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%