Environmental Aesthetics 1988
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511571213.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual compatibility in architecture: an issue of personal taste?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…; Previous research has shown a close link between respondents' opinions expressed on location and those expressed in response to photos (Groat, 1988); this supports the use of photographic images within the online questionnaire. A recent study into aesthetic preferences used photographic images of street elevations in a similar way (Gjerde, 2011).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…; Previous research has shown a close link between respondents' opinions expressed on location and those expressed in response to photos (Groat, 1988); this supports the use of photographic images within the online questionnaire. A recent study into aesthetic preferences used photographic images of street elevations in a similar way (Gjerde, 2011).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Although it is clear that experience of the built environment is four-dimensional, previous research (Groat, 1988;Nasar, 1998;Stamps, 2000) has found a relative correlation between preferences expressed in response to two-dimensional photographic images and preferences expressed in the field. That is to say, relativity between preferences expressed in response to two-dimensional photographic images correlates strongly to the relativity between preferences expressed by people who visit and spatially experience the same scenes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the project consisted of both restoration work [10][11][12][13], and an architectural addition [14][15][16][17], which is also required to accommodate contemporary facilities for a museum of urban archaeology. The project addresses the issue of utilization of this underground archaeological space as an intervention [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], the design concept of which manifests itself in the form of a museum of archaeology wrapping around a sacred core conserved in its authentic location. Hence, a unique spatial experience is intended whereby divine content and historical substance are intertwined into a ceremonial and mysterious hybrid of the multi-cultural physical context.…”
Section: Architectural Intervention As An Implant Surgery To the Archmentioning
confidence: 99%