2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10922-012-9259-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Aware Service Ranking in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranking approach is not only based on the importance of the QoS requirements, but also on users' con dence for assigning values to each QoS's attributes. [Niu et al 2014] also propose a ranking approach for WSN services using QoS with an incorporation of user feedback/rating (i.e. Quality of Experience (QoE)) for di erent services within a time interval (time threshold).…”
Section: Fig 4 Taxonomy Of Indexing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranking approach is not only based on the importance of the QoS requirements, but also on users' con dence for assigning values to each QoS's attributes. [Niu et al 2014] also propose a ranking approach for WSN services using QoS with an incorporation of user feedback/rating (i.e. Quality of Experience (QoE)) for di erent services within a time interval (time threshold).…”
Section: Fig 4 Taxonomy Of Indexing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao propor alguma estratégia de busca deve-se, primeiramente, delinear a estratégia de seleção, ranqueamento e recomendação. Várias abordagens são propostas [24,36,19,38,18,23,39,27,37], inclusive algumas considerando atributos de qualidade de produtores de dados, no entanto, diversas delas são complexas demais e demandam muito processamento. Assim, deseja-se que o mecanismo de busca seja rápido e exija o mínimo, ou nenhuma interação explícita.…”
Section: Requisitosunclassified
“…In their method, user priorities are used to modify the QoS weights, and ranking score is essentially determined by the weighted sum of QoS information. The work introduced by Niu et al takes the QoS based ranking method one step further by incorporating user assessment information [28]. The authors also make use of the timeliness information (to characterise the impact of physical quality variation on QoS) to further improve ranking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%