2016
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contesting the Divided City: Arts of Resistance in Skopje

Abstract: This paper examines issues of power and resistance in "divided cities". Basing my analysis on fieldwork I carried out in Skopje, Macedonia, I look at how urban space may be constructed and used by hegemonic groups as a means of asserting their power and how, in turn, the city may be a place of resistance where power is contested and public space reappropriated. Drawing on Lefebvre's perspective on the production of space, I compare the conceived city to the lived city and examine how urban inhabitants may resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sensitivity to the contestation of spatial coding reveals a diversity of counter‐hegemonic practices and suggests a promising agenda for further research. For instance, a variety of artistic practices engage in poetic manipulations of space, from broadcasting sounds of past riots that disturb the pacified spatial order of a public park (Pinder :400) to installing a sculpture of a golden toilet to encourage passers‐by to question the neoliberal aestheticisation of urban exclusion (Véron :1457–1458). Play, gamification, and creative re‐appropriation are also used to destabilise hegemonic spatial rules and build new socio‐spatial relationships (Crossa ; Pinder ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitivity to the contestation of spatial coding reveals a diversity of counter‐hegemonic practices and suggests a promising agenda for further research. For instance, a variety of artistic practices engage in poetic manipulations of space, from broadcasting sounds of past riots that disturb the pacified spatial order of a public park (Pinder :400) to installing a sculpture of a golden toilet to encourage passers‐by to question the neoliberal aestheticisation of urban exclusion (Véron :1457–1458). Play, gamification, and creative re‐appropriation are also used to destabilise hegemonic spatial rules and build new socio‐spatial relationships (Crossa ; Pinder ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What was the economic value of (re)building twenty‐eight government buildings, five squares, eight parking lots, several bridges, two fountains, eighty or more statues and monuments, a triumphal arch, and even a replica of the London Eye except for lining the pockets of oligarchs with over 660 million euros? In 2017, after years of more or less successful protests (Veron 2016), only hardcore supporters of Gruevski justified the project. Most citizens, and especially international critics, openly criticized its rationale and aesthetics, which included plenty of plastic façades glued to older brutalist buildings, as a kitsch, corrupt project (Holleran & Mattioli 2022; Pojani 2015; 2018).…”
Section: Seeing Like the Regime? Crisis In The Eyes Of Domestic Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lefebvre's triad has been widely used in various disciplines (Dorsch, 2013), more specifically in relation to public space to explain, for example, its resistance to commodification (Tornaghi, 2015), its co-production and reshaping (Wolf & Mahaffey, 2016), factors influencing its variations in Qatar (Salama & Wiedmann, 2013), or its state in neoliberal urban dynamics and regeneration in South Africa (Landman, 2019;Nkooe, 2018). More specifically, in the context of divided cities, the triad served to explain power relations and the construction of urban divides, or how lived space could counter divisions reinforced by conceived space (Nagle, 2009;Véron, 2016). Regarding Beirut, the triad has been used to explain the promotion of public space identity (Saksouk-Sasso, 2015) and people's role in shaping reconstructed urban spaces (Deeb & Harb, 2013;Fawaz, 2014).…”
Section: The Production Of Public Spacementioning
confidence: 99%