1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02272795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content scaling of affect in adolescent speech samples

Abstract: Data are reported which extend the applicability of the Gottschalk-Gleser scales for the content analysis of speech samples to adolescents. The data were gathered on 112 youngsters aged 11-18 stratified by age, race, and sex in a balanced design. Girls had higher Anxiety scores and relatively lower scores on Hostility Directed Inward, Ambivalent Hostility, and Social Alienation and Personal Disorganization than did boys. Blacks spoke less words and expressed more Overt Hostility Outward than did Whites. These … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter finding points to a developmental feature with respect to the relative magnitude of affects in children as compared to adults, which has been previously noted (Gleser, Seligman, Winget, & Rauh, 1977; Gleser, Winget, & Seligman, 1979; Gottschalk, 1976; Uliana, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The latter finding points to a developmental feature with respect to the relative magnitude of affects in children as compared to adults, which has been previously noted (Gleser, Seligman, Winget, & Rauh, 1977; Gleser, Winget, & Seligman, 1979; Gottschalk, 1976; Uliana, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This must have been an effect resulting solely from the combination of subscores, none of which was outstanding in itself. Similarly, the average numbers of words given by each group were unusually low when compared with those from the 15 to 16 and 17 to 18 year olds of Gleser, Winget and Seligman (1978).…”
Section: The Pre-programme Experiences Of the Youth (Experimentals Anmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The people in all these groups were, of course, currently experiencing events different from those experienced by the adolescents of this study. Comparisons with American adolescents, a group more similar in age, were also possible (Gottschalk, 1976;Gleser, Winget & Seligman, 1978) and with a special sample of American adolescents who had been diagnosed as sufficiently disturbed to need psychotherapy (Gleser, Winget, Seligman & Rauh, 1977).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important metric, though it is incomplete according to experts in the fields of psychology and psychiatry (Gottschalk, 1955;Gottschalk, 1995;Gottschalk, Hausmann, & Brown, 1975;Jarvis, 1949;Kaplan, 1943;Malla, 1991;Viney, 1981Viney, , 1983. The Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Method for measuring the magnitude of various psychobiological states and traits was found to be the most widely tested and adopted method for analyzing the emotional intensity of communication content (Gleser, 1979;Gottschalk & Gleser, 1969;Gottschalk, 1999;Gottschalk &Bechtel, 1982;Gottschalk& Bechtel, 1989, 1995.…”
Section: Research Question 2: Metrics For Emotional Intensity Of Langmentioning
confidence: 99%