Contemporary use of ultrasonic versus standard electrosurgical dissection in laparoscopic nephrectomy: Safety, efficacy and cost

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ultrasonic dissection (USD) compared with standard monopolar electrosurgery (ES) in laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN).Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of patients’ records who underwent elective LN was performed. Patients were divided in to two groups: USD and ES groups depending on the energy source used during LN. The preoperative (demographics, indication for surgery), intraoperative (conversion to open surgery, operative time, estimated blood loss [EBL], complications), and postoperative (morbidity/mortality, volume of drainage, hospital stay, cost) data were collected and analysed.ResultsBetween February 2004 and February 2008, 136 patients were included. The indications for nephrectomy were: inflammatory (51 patients), non-inflammatory (64), and tumours (21). The two groups were similar for preoperative data. The conversion rate to open surgery (12.5%) and mean operative time did not differ significantly between the groups. However, intraoperative mean EBL was significantly less with USD, at 140.8 mL vs 182.6 mL for ES. There were no differences in postoperative parameters and morbidity. USD was significantly more expensive than ES (59 000 vs 26 000 Indian Rupees).ConclusionsES is a safe and feasible tool like USD in LN when used with caution. USD facilitates completion of difficult cases and reduces intraoperative blood loss. However, the majority of LNs can be completed safely with ES. ES is sturdy and cheap; therefore, selective use of USD appears to be the most cost-effective policy in the developing world.

Study of sleeve inner diameter to suppress backward heating for microwave surgical energy device

“…Modern surgical treatments such as laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery have become safer due to medical devices improvement. Especially, introduction of surgical energy devices such as electrical scalpel and ultrasonically activated scalpel improved the surgical treatment operation [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Surgical energy devices are capable of coagulating the biological tissue, blood vessel sealing, and cutting the biological tissue, resulting in a new treatment that enables both hemostasis and incision with a single device.…”

Characteristics of an antenna generating a localized heating region for robotic surgery

“…Surgical devices such as an electrical scalpel and ultrasonically activated scalpel are currently used modern surgery [1]- [6]. However, it is reported that these devices generate surgical smoke during coagulating and incision of biological tissues, which has become a problem.…”

Coagulated region analysis in a microwave surgical device with temperature-dependent physical properties of tissue

“…In modern surgery, surgical devices having multiple functions (e.g., tissue coagulation and tissue resection) are frequently used [1,2,3,4]. These devices contribute to shortening the operation time and suppressing the amount of bleeding [5,6].…”