ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare the continuous and combined suturing
techniques in regards to the needing epicardial pacing at the time of
weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (EP-CPB) and to evaluate permanent
epicardial pacemaker (PEP) implantation in patients who had undergone
surgical ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure.MethodsThis single-centre retrospective survey includes 365 patients who had
consecutively undergone VSD closure between January 2006 and October 2015.
ResultsThe median age and weight of the patients were 15 months (range 27 days -
56.9 years) and 10 kg (range 3.5 - 100 kg), respectively. Continuous and
combined suturing techniques were utilised in 302 (82.7%) and 63 (17.3%)
patients, respectively. While 25 (6.8%) patients required EP-CPB, PEP was
implanted in eight (2.2%) patients. Comparison of the continuous and
combined suturing techniques regarding the need for EP-CPB (72%
vs. 28%, P=0.231) and PEP implantation
(87.5% vs. 12.5%, P=1.0) were not
statistically significant. The rate of PEP implantation in patients with
perimembraneous VSD without extension and perimembraneous VSD with inlet
extension did not reveal significant difference between the suture
techniques (P=1.0 and P=0.16,
respectively). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, large VSD
(P=0.001; OR 8.63; P=0.011) and
perimembraneous VSD with inlet extension (P<0.001; OR
9.02; P=0.005) had a significant influence on PEP
implantation.ConclusionBoth suturing techniques were comparable regarding the need for EP-CPB or PEP
implantation. Caution should be exercised when closing a large
perimembraneous VSD with inlet extension.