Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Indications, Insights, and Innovations 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118674888.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Concepts of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 provided the scanning parameters of the FS, ZS, and HZ modes of NewTom CBCT. The original image number corresponds to exposure time and the milliampere second (mAs) was the product of milliampere and exposure time [ 13 ]. Therefore, the differences among the three modes actually existed at: field of view, voxel size and radiographic exposure related parameters (KV, mA and exposure time).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 provided the scanning parameters of the FS, ZS, and HZ modes of NewTom CBCT. The original image number corresponds to exposure time and the milliampere second (mAs) was the product of milliampere and exposure time [ 13 ]. Therefore, the differences among the three modes actually existed at: field of view, voxel size and radiographic exposure related parameters (KV, mA and exposure time).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the differences among the three modes actually existed at: field of view, voxel size and radiographic exposure related parameters (KV, mA and exposure time). The field of view of the HZ and ZS modes were both small, and the FS was medium [ 13 ]. The kilovolt value of the three modes was the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,17 When required, CBCT should be performed using the smallest possible field of view needed for the specific clinical scenario. 5 Finally, the comparison of CBCT radiation exposure with the combined exposure of cephalograms and panoramic radiographs to justify the routine use of CBCT on orthodontic patients is based on a paradigm that assumes that all orthodontic patients should be subjected to routine 2D radiography. Indeed the findings of the systematic reviews [13][14][15] suggest that these 2D radiographs should also only be taken when they are expected to provide additional information that could aid in diagnosis or treatment planning or for assessing progress or complications during treatment.…”
Section: Radiology Guidelines In Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In orthodontics, 3D imaging can help unravel the complexity of dental and skeletal malocclusions and improve diagnosis and treatment planning in specific case types. 4,5 The varied utilization of CBCT by clinicians for orthodontic purposes exists within the context of research evidence, published case reports or anecdotal observations on a broad spectrum of cases ranging from impacted teeth to temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology. Several of these studies show that CBCT provides clinically relevant information and novel 3D research data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%