2021
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Approaches for Site‐Selective Dual Functionalization of Proteins

Abstract: Figure 12. (a) The self-labelingpeptide of tetracysteine reacting with FlAsH forming fluorescentconjugate.A dapted with permissionf rom ref. [15]. Copyright (2015) Royal Society of Chemistry (b) Incorporating the chromophore and CFP as FRET pair to GPCR to probe protein dynamics. Adapted with permissionf rom ref. [15].C opyright (2015) Royal Society of Chemistry (c) Incorporation of FRET pair into Calmodulin (CaM) via genetic code expansion techniquea nd the corresponding fluorescence spectra after addition of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these results confirm a striking chemoselectivity and mutual orthogonality between both methods and indicate that both cycloadditions share similar kinetic profiles under these conditions. This mutual orthogonality promises relevant applications, such as for the dual tagging of biomolecules [22] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall, these results confirm a striking chemoselectivity and mutual orthogonality between both methods and indicate that both cycloadditions share similar kinetic profiles under these conditions. This mutual orthogonality promises relevant applications, such as for the dual tagging of biomolecules [22] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bioorthogonal reactions rely on introduction into the polymers of functional groups different from those found in amino acid side chains, able to chemoselectively react in mild conditions with high yields. Among them, the so-called click chemistry [24][25][26][27], based, for example, on Huisgen-type cycloaddition [28], Staudinger reaction [29,30], Diels-Alder [31][32][33], thiol-ene addition [34,35], and carbonyl/oxime-hydrazone chemistry [36,37], has been proposed over recent years. The main drawback of bioorthogonal reactions arises from the need for a two-step process, involving first the introduction of orthogonal functional groups, either by chemical or enzymatic reactions [38] or protein engineering [39] approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly agreed that these tools will provide major insight into basic biology and enable the development of functional bioconjugates with unprecedented properties. To deliver on these promises, it will be key to discover new technologies that offer not only bioconjugation efficacy, but as importantly, site‐selectivity, orthogonality and new mechanisms to control the peptide structure [2] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%