1996
DOI: 10.1162/isec.21.2.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
170
0
12

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
170
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Peninsular states where Christian growth rates approach or exceed that of Hindus are more than twice as likely to experience violence compared to states where Hindu growth rates are higher. Our results, therefore, provide support for differential growth theories advanced by Horowitz (2001), Lake and Rothchild (2001), Toft (2007) and Weiner (2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Peninsular states where Christian growth rates approach or exceed that of Hindus are more than twice as likely to experience violence compared to states where Hindu growth rates are higher. Our results, therefore, provide support for differential growth theories advanced by Horowitz (2001), Lake and Rothchild (2001), Toft (2007) and Weiner (2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, the security hypothesis states that the decision to stay away because of a fear of ethnic violence (Lake and Rothchild 1996;Walter 1999;Annan et al 2011) is likely associated with a sense of vulnerability (greater for women and families with small children), traumatic war-time experiences (such as an individual's victimization or loss of a significant other) and the presence of ethnic others in the village (such as settlers or a military forces). Unfortunately, as will be shown below, measurement difficulties constrained our ability to test the security hypothesis properly.…”
Section: Main Hypotheses On Returnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Lake and Rothchild (1996) assert that the pursuit of particularistic objectives often becomes embodied in competing visions of just, legitimate, and appropriate political orders. This encompasses such demands as greater autonomy and decentralization, resource control, and restructuring of state power, fair power division and group rights (Ajayi, 2006;Ogunrotifa, 2014;Osaghae 2004).…”
Section: State Policies and Sub-nationalism And Citizenship In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%