2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contagious scratching: shared feelings but not shared body locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that movies depicting scratching activated many of the regions associated with physically induced itch (via histamine administration) and not motor regions of the brain associated with contagious scratching (although people were prevented from scratching in the scanner, which may have inhibited this response [3] ). Therefore, we would agree with [7] that "contagious itchiness may be more driven by vicarious perception of the feeling state (itchiness/unpleasantness) than contagion of the motor act or bodily target." In other words, people do not observe itch, they observe the subsequent scratch and from this infer that the person who is scratching is itchy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have shown that movies depicting scratching activated many of the regions associated with physically induced itch (via histamine administration) and not motor regions of the brain associated with contagious scratching (although people were prevented from scratching in the scanner, which may have inhibited this response [3] ). Therefore, we would agree with [7] that "contagious itchiness may be more driven by vicarious perception of the feeling state (itchiness/unpleasantness) than contagion of the motor act or bodily target." In other words, people do not observe itch, they observe the subsequent scratch and from this infer that the person who is scratching is itchy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This partially agrees with a previous study where participants rated videos depicting scratching of the upper arm significantly itchier than the forearm and chest [3] . Of the 21 (64%) participants who produced spontaneous scratches in response to these videos, the majority were directed to the face and hair [7] , but there were no differences between males and females. We also found that the vast majority of scratches (79%) were directed toward the participant's head regardless of the body part depicted in the image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has been shown that a lecture about itch along with presenting pictures of insects, scratch marks, and allergic reactions, increases itching and accompanying scratching behaviour in an audience, as compared to a neutral lecture (Niemeier and Gieler, 2000). However, several other studies on contagious itch demonstrated significant increases in itch and scratching in both patients and healthy subjects (Ogden and Zoukas, 2009;Holle et al, 2012;Lloyd et al, 2013;Ward et al, 2013;Schut et al, 2014), with some studies demonstrating more pronounced responses in patients with chronic itch than in healthy subjects (Papoiu et al, 2011;Schut et al, 2014). In one study, patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and healthy subjects watched a video either with people scratching or with neutral content, while a histamine or a placebo stimulus was administered.…”
Section: Effects and Mechanisms In Placebo And Nocebo Effects On Itchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through to a physiological study exploring the experience of misophonia, describing a sensitivity to sound that can substantially limit ones ability to interact with others (Edelstein et al, 2013), and a commentary of why vicarious perception may drive contagious scratching (Ward et al, 2013);…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%