2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact stresses in a patient-specific unicompartmental knee replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that the new mobile-bearing implant resulted in lower contact stresses in the tibiofemoral joint compared to the fixed-bearing implants. Moreover, lower stresses at the bone-implant interface were observed compared to other conventional implants [207]. A mobile bearing TKR was experimentally tested and numerically modeled using Patran and ABAQUS [208].…”
Section: Pathomechanical Modeling and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the new mobile-bearing implant resulted in lower contact stresses in the tibiofemoral joint compared to the fixed-bearing implants. Moreover, lower stresses at the bone-implant interface were observed compared to other conventional implants [207]. A mobile bearing TKR was experimentally tested and numerically modeled using Patran and ABAQUS [208].…”
Section: Pathomechanical Modeling and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For negative flexion and deep flexion, the contact pressure is higher than 60 MPa, which will lead to wear of the polyethylene components in total knee arthroplasties, a potential long-term problem. van den Heever et al analyzed the contact stresses in a patient-specific unicompartmental knee replacement [5]. The maximum contact stresses usually occurred at 45° flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three PS J-curves for the trochlear grooves and the medial and lateral condyles were generated in computer-aided design software with the reference of normal articular geometry of the subject in this study. 18 19 20 Planes were extracted into the condyles in the sagittal view, in which the curves were used to duplicate the surface geometry articulations (Figure 2 ). In general, a femur of a patient in the coronal plane provides asymmetric lateral and medial condyles: the coronal offset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%