2002
DOI: 10.1021/ac011058e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Conductivity Detection in Poly(methyl methacylate)-Based Microfluidic Devices for Analysis of Mono- and Polyanionic Molecules

Abstract: An on-column contact conductivity detector was developed for the analysis of various mono- and polyanionic compounds separated by electrophoresis chips fabricated in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) using hot embossing techniques from Ni electroforms. The detector consisted of a pair of Pt wires (127 microm diameter) with an end-to-end spacing of approximately 20 microm and situated within the fluidic channel. The waveform applied to the electrode pair was a bipolar pulse with a frequency of 5.0 kHz and was us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
165
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
165
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…44 The chemical composition of CTCs make them ideal candidates for detection using conductivity due to their unique electrical properties compared to erythrocytes or leukocytes. For example, CTCs in general possess very low membrane potential and low impedance resulting from the intracellular migration of sodium ions (Na + ) in compensation for the depleted potassium ion concentration (K + ) of the intracellular fluid.…”
Section: Conductivity Sensor For Cell Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The chemical composition of CTCs make them ideal candidates for detection using conductivity due to their unique electrical properties compared to erythrocytes or leukocytes. For example, CTCs in general possess very low membrane potential and low impedance resulting from the intracellular migration of sodium ions (Na + ) in compensation for the depleted potassium ion concentration (K + ) of the intracellular fluid.…”
Section: Conductivity Sensor For Cell Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Conductivity detection can be classified into two modes: contact mode and contactless mode. In contact mode, the microelectrode directly contacts the solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contact mode, the microelectrode directly contacts the solution. 1,2 In contactless mode, the microelectrode is insulated from the solution by an insulating layer. [3][4][5][6][7] Compared with contact mode, contactless mode has several advantages because of the insulation of the electrode from the solution, such as the elimination of electrode fouling, bubble generation, and the isolation from the separation voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 For this report, we chose microchips made of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) which is one of the most common polymeric substrates for fabrication of microchips and it has been applied for protein separation. 6,[14][15][16] Previously our group reported a covalent coating on PMMA microchannels by polyethyleneglycol (PEG) which successfully controlled protein adsorption on surfaces, 6 and dynamic coating by using linear polysaccharides such as cellulose derivatives which have a self-coating ability has been applied to prevent sample adsorption on the surface of PMMA microchips. [17][18][19] As well, we systematically characterized spontaneous adsorption of surfactants and cellulose on PMMA surface using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and infrared external-reflection (IR-ER) spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%