CONTACT – communication protocol for family practitioners and specialists

Abstract

Introduction. Ability to gather and process medical data serves as a basic tool of doctor’s work, which can be improved by applying communication protocols. In most cases, however, instructions presented by such models are too general and do not take into account patients’ preferences. Material and Methods. The study was carried out in the form of an electronic questionairre sent to a randomly chosen group of adult patients (N = 967). It consisted of close-ended questions about the quality of communication skills of family practitioners and specialists working at outpatient clinics and health centers. Results. Only 21% of patients claimed that the appointment started on time. 51% mentioned disruptions during the meeting, mainly by a third party (34%). A considerable majority of physicians carried out the interview in a manner that was understood by patients, nevertheless 56.6% of the respondents felt underinformed as far as the nature of their illness was concerned – these objections were mostly expressed by patients suffering from chronic diseases. Conclusions. Our research shows that a proper organization of work as well as observing the principles of appropriate clinical communication can facilitate doctors’ performance, and thus increase both the level of patients’ satisfaction and the quality of medical services.

The “CONNECT” Protocol: Delivering Bad News by Phone or Video Call

“…Due to the growing need to deliver bad news via remote communication, I obtained the permission of the authors of the CONTACT protocol to adopt it to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. 38 Initially, the CONTACT protocol served as a tool for education, which was created to benefit students of medicine and health professionals. Its purpose was to optimise contact between practitioners and patients on the basis of previously completed research.…”