2011
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201000474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Angle of Ethanol and n-Propanol Aqueous Solutions on Metal Surfaces

Abstract: The contact angles of the aqueous solution of ethanol and that of n-propanol on copper, aluminum, and stainless steel surfaces are reported. The contact angles were measured under atmospheric conditions, and then under vapor-liquid equilibrium conditions at 1 atm and different temperatures. The results showed the variations of the contact angles with the concentrations of aqueous solutions on different metal material surfaces with different roughness. Some unstable behavior of the wetting ability around the az… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methanol mass fraction values in this work were chosen consistent with mass fractions from bubble point measurements. Contact angle measurements for mixtures here are also in qualitative agreement with previously reported results from Fan et al 8 for ethanol and n-propanol aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methanol mass fraction values in this work were chosen consistent with mass fractions from bubble point measurements. Contact angle measurements for mixtures here are also in qualitative agreement with previously reported results from Fan et al 8 for ethanol and n-propanol aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6 This result suggests the possibility of a considerable adsorption of methanol at the SS304/solution interface. Fan et al 8 provides experimental data from neutron diffraction studies along with molecular dynamic simulation that show that, even though water and methanol mix in all proportions, there are extended structures that transform into "bipercolating liquid mixtures." The surface structure may be quite complex.…”
Section: Appendix B: Langmuir Isotherm For the Sl And Sv Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides a higher viscosity of the solvent [63], an increase in the hydrophobicity of the screw surface or a decrease in the gap size [64] could prevent the solvent from wetting the gaps. In the present case, the screw elements are made of high quality, pharmaceutical-grade stainless steel that generally has good wetting behaviour for water [65] and an even better one for aqueous ethanol solutions [66]. Therefore, the steel type in combination with the solvent employed in the present case promotes wetting in gaps.…”
Section: Swab Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because high surface tension liquids and low surface energy solids rarely render intrinsic contact angles θ < 45° ( Fig. 1 B ), it is not surprising that liquids with medium-to-high surface tension such as water or mercury do not wet low surface energy materials, structured or not ( 10 20 ). Therefore, turning a nonwetting liquid/solid combination highly wetting is fundamentally significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach allows for a metastable hemiwicking state using surface reentrant structures, regardless of intrinsic wettabilities ( iii ). ( B ) Typical intrinsic contact angles for combinations of liquids of different surface tensions and solids with different surface energies with example references ( 10 20 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%