1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00257-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and an automated polynomial fit program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the resulting contact angle depends highly on the polynomial degree and on the number of coordinates points [11]. Despite these delicate issues, polynomial fitting remains the method of choice when considering non-axisymmetric drops, as shown in several comparative studies [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the resulting contact angle depends highly on the polynomial degree and on the number of coordinates points [11]. Despite these delicate issues, polynomial fitting remains the method of choice when considering non-axisymmetric drops, as shown in several comparative studies [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With extensive applications of computers, Neumann et al [2] developed an Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis-Profile (ADSA-P) measurement system, which is reported to be able to improve measurement precision [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The hysteresis produced by solid surface roughness and heterogeneity has been examined [11,12], and the theoretical understanding of the relationship between the contact angle and the dimensions of the liquid drop was greatly advanced [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when such procedures are interpreted by an automated axisymmetric drop shape analysis-profile (ADSA-P)-complexities such as dissolution of the polymer by the liquid and slip/stick of the three-phase contact line, which affect the contact angle interpretation in terms of surface energetics, can be identified (55)(56)(57).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%