2013
DOI: 10.1097/der.0b013e31828ac634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Allergy to Shoe Components in Professionals and Nonprofessionals of the Shoe Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, India reported a substantially higher prevalence, ranging from 13.4% to 24.2% (Table 3). 2,3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Our data demonstrated a higher likelihood of females developing footwear ACD than males. This finding aligns with the majority of previous studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, India reported a substantially higher prevalence, ranging from 13.4% to 24.2% (Table 3). 2,3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Our data demonstrated a higher likelihood of females developing footwear ACD than males. This finding aligns with the majority of previous studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This finding aligns with the majority of previous studies (Table 3). 13,15 The female predominance can be attributed to the broader range of materials used in female footwear and the likelihood of females not wearing socks, which may potentiate sensitisation. However, it is essential to note that the proportion of females in our Footwear ACD Group was significantly lower than that of females with ACD caused by other factors at our clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation