2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00773.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption of black tea or coffee and risk of ovarian cancer

Abstract: The goal of this study was to investigate the associations between ovarian cancer risk and usual consumption of black tea, regular coffee, or decaffeinated coffee. Using a hospital-based case-control design, participants included 414 women with primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer and 868 age- and region-matched women with nonneoplastic conditions. All participants completed a comprehensive epidemiologic questionnaire. Black tea consumption was associated with a linear decline in ovarian… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some prior studies did not distinguish between caffeinated and decaffeinated forms of coffee (9)(10)(11)14) or between brewed and instant preparation methods (5,(8)(9)(10)(11)15). Although the frequency of coffee drinking varied between populations, most studies were able to assess risk among women with substantial daily exposure, with the upper exposure category ranging from z1 in the study of Goodman et al (8) to z3 in the current study to z4 in most other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some prior studies did not distinguish between caffeinated and decaffeinated forms of coffee (9)(10)(11)14) or between brewed and instant preparation methods (5,(8)(9)(10)(11)15). Although the frequency of coffee drinking varied between populations, most studies were able to assess risk among women with substantial daily exposure, with the upper exposure category ranging from z1 in the study of Goodman et al (8) to z3 in the current study to z4 in most other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Among studies published since 2000, positive (5,8,14), inverse (10), and null (6,9,11,15) findings have been reported. Of studies reporting an increased risk, one reported an increase only among premenopausal women (5), another reported an overall increase in a predominantly postmenopausal population (8), and the third observed an increased risk in a cohort of whom roughly half of participants were postmenopausal (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional studies have evaluated the association between flavonoid-rich foods and beverages and ovarian cancer risk. 10, Although some studies have found inverse associations with consumption of certain vegetables and fruits, tea and other dietary sources of flavonoids, 22,[26][27][28]31,33,39,42,45 overall the data are equivocal. The same flavonoid can be present in multiple foods and beverages, which suggests that an association between flavonoid intake and ovarian cancer risk could exist despite the absence of a clear association with consumption of certain flavonoid-rich foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On tea drinking and ovarian cancer, eight casecontrol studies (Byers et al, 1983;Miller et al, 1987;La Vecchia et al, 1992;Kuper et al, 2000;Tavani et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2002;Jordan et al, 2004;Baker et al, 2007) and, including this study, five cohort studies (Zheng et al, 1996;Larsson and Wolk, 2005b;Gates et al, 2007;Silvera et al, 2007) have been conducted. Coffee drinking and ovarian cancer risk was investigated in 16 case-control studies (Trichopoulos et al, 1981;Hartge et al, 1982;Byers et al, 1983;Cramer et al, 1984;La Vecchia et al, 1984;Tzonou et al, 1984;Miller et al, 1987;Whittemore et al, 1988;Polychronopoulou et al, 1993;Kuper et al, 2000;Tavani et al, 2001;Jordan et al, 2004;Riman et al, 2004;Baker et al, 2007) and, including this study, five cohort studies (Snowdon and Phillips, 1984;Stensvold and Jacobsen, 1994;Larsson and Wolk, 2005a;Silvera et al, 2007). We had to exclude from the meta-analysis studies that did not report 95% CIs (Trichopoulos et al, 1981;Byers et al, 1983;Cramer et al, 1984;Tzonou et al, 1984;Stensvold and Jacobsen, 1994).…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%