2020
DOI: 10.5195/emaj.2020.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Current State of Research and Suggestions for Future Study

Abstract: This article reviews the state of the literature on consumption at the bottom of the pyramid and summarizes the studies' suggestions for future research. This study was conducted using data from the Web of Science and Scopus databases with the help of CiteSpace and CitNetExplorer 1.0.0. This research is justified due to: (a) absence of a broad systematization of the theme; (b) contribution and encouragement of new researchers to take part in studies on the subject; and (c) indication of a broad international l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, rural e-commerce has created logisticsrelated jobs for BoP communities, providing many rural residents with the opportunity to work locally instead of emigrating into the city [6]. In the development of rural e-commerce, the BoP plays the roles of consumer (e.g., Lappeman et al [5]; Campos et al [7]) and partner (e.g., Wan et al [8]; Chen and Yu [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rural e-commerce has created logisticsrelated jobs for BoP communities, providing many rural residents with the opportunity to work locally instead of emigrating into the city [6]. In the development of rural e-commerce, the BoP plays the roles of consumer (e.g., Lappeman et al [5]; Campos et al [7]) and partner (e.g., Wan et al [8]; Chen and Yu [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An avalanche of literature reviews related to BOP scholarship has appeared during the recent decennium. For instance, Kolk and colleagues (2014), Dembek and colleagues (2020), and Pineda-Escobar & Merigo (2020) have offered general overviews of the BOP literature, while other sets of review studies focused on specific phenomena in relation to BOP: from innovations (Agarwal et al, 2016; Farooq, 2017; Molina-Maturano et al, 2020; Pansera & Martinez, 2017; Unalan & Ozcan, 2020) to supply chain (Khalid & Seuring, 2019; Khalid et al, 2015; ur Rehman et al, 2020) or consumer issues (Campos et al, 2020; Choudhury et al, 2018; Srivastava et al, 2020). Other literature reviews examined service research in the context of BOP (Gebauer & Reynoso, 2013), sustainable development and BOP (Du et al, 2021), or BOP and positive social change (Stephan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Developments In Bop Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%