2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-10182015000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumo de antimicrobianos en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva del Hospital Dr. Guillermo Rawson-San Juan, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a decreasing trend in the consumption of cefepime was observed in the present study, whereas ceftazidime showed an increasing trend. In the study by Vega et al (2015), the consumption (in DDD/100 beds-day) of cefepime and ceftazidime decreased between 2008 and 2011 from 10.19 to 1.48 and 2.2 to 0.25, respectively 14 .…”
Section: /6mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, a decreasing trend in the consumption of cefepime was observed in the present study, whereas ceftazidime showed an increasing trend. In the study by Vega et al (2015), the consumption (in DDD/100 beds-day) of cefepime and ceftazidime decreased between 2008 and 2011 from 10.19 to 1.48 and 2.2 to 0.25, respectively 14 .…”
Section: /6mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…El uso de las DDD y DDD/100 estancias permitió hacer comparaciones entre los años estudiados, sin que los datos se vean afectados por los cambios de precios o presentaciones comerciales, sin embargo, la DDD no refleja necesariamente la dosis diaria recomendada o prescrita, pues estas son individualizadas, especialmente en pacientes críticos. Por lo que los datos de DDD son una estimación aproximada y no una fotografía real (Vega et al, 2015), aunque sí permiten comparar el consumo del servicio estudiado con otros servicios u otros hospitales del mismo nivel.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…La prescripción de antimicrobianos en los pacientes de la UCI es una de las estrategias más frecuentes debido a las patologías propias del paciente y al riesgo de infección intrahospitalaria (Vega et al, 2015), esto, sumado a la dificultad a la hora de diferenciar entre el Síndrome de Respuesta inflamatoria Sistémica (SRIS), de origen infeccioso y no infeccioso, hace que la prescripción empírica de un tratamiento sea un factor crítico en la evolución de dicho paciente, para lo cual es imprescindible conocer la flora endógena (Rodríguez-Baño et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…To study the consumption evolution during the study period, the percentage of change (increase or reduction) was calculated by subtracting the consumption data (DDD/100 beds-days) from 2018 compared to 2015, dividing by the consumption in the first-year of study, and multiplying the result by 100 [37]. An increasing or decreasing trend was considered when the percentage of change with respect to the previous selected year by therapeutic group varied more than 50% [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%