1991
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90046-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumers' evaluative structures in two ethical situations: A means-end approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumer value formation may stem from the bundle of attributes that the product possesses, which could be tangible or intangible (Kotler, 2002;McColl-Kennedy & Kiel, 2000). Product attributes identified in the literature included packaging, color, price, quality, brand, even the service level and reputation of the seller (Pitts, Wong, & Whalen, 1991;Stanton, Etzel, & Michael, 1991). Product attributes are intermediate values that consumers perceive to achieve final ends of benefits rather than risks (Peter, Olson, & Grunert, 1993;Pieters, Baumgartner, & Allen, 1995;Woodruff, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer value formation may stem from the bundle of attributes that the product possesses, which could be tangible or intangible (Kotler, 2002;McColl-Kennedy & Kiel, 2000). Product attributes identified in the literature included packaging, color, price, quality, brand, even the service level and reputation of the seller (Pitts, Wong, & Whalen, 1991;Stanton, Etzel, & Michael, 1991). Product attributes are intermediate values that consumers perceive to achieve final ends of benefits rather than risks (Peter, Olson, & Grunert, 1993;Pieters, Baumgartner, & Allen, 1995;Woodruff, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the issues of cognitive types contained in a hierarchy and the specific relationships among these cognitions, another interesting proposition is that relationships between dimensional components of cognitions may vary by purchasing situation (e.g., Homer & Kahle, 1988;Pitts, Wong, & Whalen, 1991). The rationale for this influence is that, although specific motivations (or personal-value dimensions) for making a product purchase may not change by situation, specific conditions may cause a revision in the relative perceived importance attached to these motivations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(As shown in Figure 1) Figure 1. Means-End Chains model Source: Mulvey, Olson, Celsi, & Walker, 1994;Olson & Reynolds, 1983;Walker & Olson, 1991 Attributes are characteristics of preferred product or services perceived by users (Reynolds, Dethloff, & Westberg, 2001) and they may be "Concrete Attributes" that are tangible or "Abstract Attributes" that are intangible (Pitts, Wong, & Whalen, 1991;Peter & Olson, 2010). A key importance of the Means-End chains is that consumers view products as bundles of benefits (consequences), rather than bundles of attributes.…”
Section: Means-end Chains Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%