2013
DOI: 10.1108/ijphm-04-2013-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumers' evaluation of brief summary formats of print direct‐to‐consumer advertisements

Abstract: PurposeThe paper's aim is to measure the effect of various brief summary formats on consumers' drug‐related knowledge, evaluations of ad information, ad believability, attitudes towards the ad and brand, perceived product risk and intention to use ad information in making healthcare decisions.Design/methodology/approachUsing mall‐intercept surveys, 307 US women, age 18‐50 years, were randomly assigned to one of the six different versions of brief summary formats for a birth control medicine. The six brief summ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Recently, there have been calls to improve this information to enhance patients’ understanding of prescription drug information. 2,4 8 Specifically, some have advocated for a “drug facts box” similar to the one required for over-the-counter (OTC) medication. A drug facts box differs from a traditional brief summary in both formatting (a box with bullet points instead of paragraphs of text) and content (the addition of qualitative and quantitative information about benefits and risks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Recently, there have been calls to improve this information to enhance patients’ understanding of prescription drug information. 2,4 8 Specifically, some have advocated for a “drug facts box” similar to the one required for over-the-counter (OTC) medication. A drug facts box differs from a traditional brief summary in both formatting (a box with bullet points instead of paragraphs of text) and content (the addition of qualitative and quantitative information about benefits and risks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%