2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer preferences for household water treatment products in Andhra Pradesh, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The user preference ranking exercise indicated that boiling (with an efficient stove) and the pot filter (with a storage container) were the most preferred HWTS options, before costs were factored in. The pot filter was preferred across districts and across source water quality, as has been observed in South Asia, but preferences for boiling were on par with the pot filter, a new finding (Luoto et al, 2012;Poulos et al, 2012). Where the source water was significantly turbid, an effective disinfectant-coagulant such as PuR was also preferred; this contrasts with previous observations from rural Kenya (Albert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The user preference ranking exercise indicated that boiling (with an efficient stove) and the pot filter (with a storage container) were the most preferred HWTS options, before costs were factored in. The pot filter was preferred across districts and across source water quality, as has been observed in South Asia, but preferences for boiling were on par with the pot filter, a new finding (Luoto et al, 2012;Poulos et al, 2012). Where the source water was significantly turbid, an effective disinfectant-coagulant such as PuR was also preferred; this contrasts with previous observations from rural Kenya (Albert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, social marketing research has found that consumer preferences and viable price points strongly influence effective demand and the likelihood of consistent use (Evans et al, 2014). This has led to several studies on user perceptions and willingness to pay for HWTS products (Luoto et al, 2012;Albert et al, 2010;Poulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorine tablets are therefore at times distributed in response to the outbreak of waterborne diseases, and have for example been distributed to thousands of households as an emergency response to a large typhoid fever outbreak in Harare, Zimbabwe (Imanishi et al 2014). The antimicrobial effectiveness and social acceptance of sodium or calcium hypochlorite and various other point-of-use water treatments such as boiling, ceramic filtration and solar disinfection has been studied extensively (Clasen & Edmondson 2006;Loo et al 2012;Poulos et al 2012;Levy et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder interviews and meetings are employed to understand how information flows in the context of interest and to identify potential use cases for new sensing technologies, whereas group design workshops are used for an initial identification of design preferences. Conjoint analysis, which is well-established in the assessment of user preferences for applications such as consumer products [45], healthcare decisions [46], and environmental policies [47,48], is used here to provide a quantitative assessment of the relative importance of different attributes. This work is intended to present our fieldwork-based determination of design priorities for point-of-use bacterial water detection, as well as best practices for other researchers developing sensors for use in resource-limited areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%