2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer preferences for food labels on tomatoes in Germany – A comparison of a quasi-experiment and two stated preference approaches

Abstract: Approaches 4Appetite (in press). DOI: 10.1016DOI: 10. /j.appet.2016 between the quasi-experiment and the two stated preference approaches. 19► The use of a combination of methods to get an understanding of the true behavior of 20 consumers is important as demonstrated by this paper. 21► The participants in the quasi-experiment preferred tomatoes without a label to those 22 with carbon footprint labels. 23► The characteristic "grown locally" shows the highest utility in the quasi-experiment 24 after price, indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
5
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Food contact materials are related to consumer product usage and must be properly indicated (Janjarasskul & Suppakul, ). Producer and traceability information (Table , checklist clauses 2 and 3) and advertisement are safety devices for reverse tracing when microbial/chemical hazards occur to prevent further harm, deduce causes, and take rapid actions (Adams, ; Liu et al, ; Mao, Wang, Hao, & Li, ; Meyerding, ; Russo & Tufi, ; Tibola, da Silva, Dossa, & Patricio, ; Tinacci et al, ). Eco‐friendliness, agricultural quality control, and geographical information and certifications (Table , checklist clauses 3 and 6) secure the economic value of food and relate to consumers’ preferences (Liu et al, ; MAFRA & MOF, ; Park, Kim, You, You, Kim, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Food contact materials are related to consumer product usage and must be properly indicated (Janjarasskul & Suppakul, ). Producer and traceability information (Table , checklist clauses 2 and 3) and advertisement are safety devices for reverse tracing when microbial/chemical hazards occur to prevent further harm, deduce causes, and take rapid actions (Adams, ; Liu et al, ; Mao, Wang, Hao, & Li, ; Meyerding, ; Russo & Tufi, ; Tibola, da Silva, Dossa, & Patricio, ; Tinacci et al, ). Eco‐friendliness, agricultural quality control, and geographical information and certifications (Table , checklist clauses 3 and 6) secure the economic value of food and relate to consumers’ preferences (Liu et al, ; MAFRA & MOF, ; Park, Kim, You, You, Kim, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the primary purpose of postmanagement (e.g., crackdowns and on‐site evaluations) in food safety is identifying causes of accidents (e.g., food poisoning outbreaks, foodborne infectious diseases, contamination, and improper labeling) and preventing their spread by banning food items not conforming with regulatory requirements (nonconforming food items). An effective postmanagement strategy, combined with a traceability system, can identify fundamental causes of accidents and points where accidents occurred (Adams, ; Liu, Li, Steele, & Fang, ; MAFRA, ; Meyerding, ; Tinacci et al, ). Ideally, these policies should be implemented complexly and the results subsequently incorporated in processes to prevent recurrence of accidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For respondents, the top priority regarding the packaging was convenience, not the ecological impact of food packaging, what seems to be contrary to the results of the consumer survey, which indicated a high importance of the environmental safety of the packaging. However, these discrepancies in answers might be attributed to the effect of social desirability, which leads to the issue that although consumers declare preferences for environmentally friendly products, this is not reflected in the real purchasing situations . Moreover, the lack of understanding or perception of the connection between buying decisions and environmental problems might also be partially the reason for the differences in responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these discrepancies in answers might be attributed to the effect of social desirability, which leads to the issue that although consumers declare preferences for environmentally friendly products, this is not reflected in the real purchasing situations. 50 Moreover, the lack of understanding or perception of the connection between buying decisions and environmental problems 51 might also be partially the reason for the differences in responses.…”
Section: Consumer Perceptions Regarding Environmental Issues Relatementioning
confidence: 99%