2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer demand for time of use electricity tariffs: A systematized review of the empirical evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on consumers' acceptance of TOU tariffs is limited. Nicolson et al [7] found in their meta-analysis covering 27 studies (66 measures) a consensus in the literature that TOU tariffs are less preferred than fixed rate tariffs. While Nicolsen et al [6] found that 39% of their British respondents state that they are willing to switch to a "smart" TOU tariff.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information on consumers' acceptance of TOU tariffs is limited. Nicolson et al [7] found in their meta-analysis covering 27 studies (66 measures) a consensus in the literature that TOU tariffs are less preferred than fixed rate tariffs. While Nicolsen et al [6] found that 39% of their British respondents state that they are willing to switch to a "smart" TOU tariff.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] investigating the potential effectiveness of TOU tariffs provide evidence that these tariffs reduce consumers' utility. A drawback of the available studies is, however, that either samples are restricted to certain consumer groups or sample sizes are too low to derive general conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of this PRISMA statement is to address researchers in the selection of systematic review articles, guaranteeing the quality of the process. Many previous studies of different research categories have used the PRISMA statement to collect an exhaustive literature review [7][8][9][10][11]. In our case, the general proposed methodology based on the PRISMA statement has two main processes: systematic review and meta-analysis.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question regarding consumers' willingness-to-shift is also a choice problem, comprising, in our case, of three alternative options: not willing to shift, willing to shift to early morning (0:01~7:00) and willing to shift to late night (20:01~0:00). Even though there are other approaches, such as simple descriptive statistics (Demski et al 2013;Tjørring et al 2018) and ordinary least squares regression analysis (M. L. Nicolson et al 2018), that have been applied in some previous studies, those approaches are not able to represent consumers' preferences for multiple options in parallel, in order to compare their choice preferences on the same statistical basis. Furthermore, the constructed MNLMs can estimate the probability of consumers' choices based on their multiple characteristics.…”
Section: Multinomial Logistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%