Marketing 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-93787-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Cognitive Styles: Review and Implications for Marketers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of such metastyles (e.g., mobility/fixity) had already been suggested by Witkin, who was the first to point out that there might be "mobile" individuals who possess both fielddependent and field-independent characteristics and can employ one style or the other depending on the situation (Witkin, 1965;Witkin et al, 1962), as well as by other early researchers (e.g., Eska & Black, 1971;Pinston, 1978). A decade later, Niaz (1987) identified four groups of college students on the basis of their field dependence/independence and intelligence measures: mobile field dependent, mobile field dependent, fixed field dependent, and fixed field dependent.…”
Section: Recent Experimental Studies Of Cognitive Stylesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The existence of such metastyles (e.g., mobility/fixity) had already been suggested by Witkin, who was the first to point out that there might be "mobile" individuals who possess both fielddependent and field-independent characteristics and can employ one style or the other depending on the situation (Witkin, 1965;Witkin et al, 1962), as well as by other early researchers (e.g., Eska & Black, 1971;Pinston, 1978). A decade later, Niaz (1987) identified four groups of college students on the basis of their field dependence/independence and intelligence measures: mobile field dependent, mobile field dependent, fixed field dependent, and fixed field dependent.…”
Section: Recent Experimental Studies Of Cognitive Stylesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cognitive style includes two dimensions: complexity and cognitive accommodation. Cognitive complexity presents three distinct components: cognitive differentiation, discrimination and integration (Pinson, 1978; Pinson et al , 1988). Cognitive differentiation corresponds to the number of attributes used by an individual to deal with information received (Pinson, 1975).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%