2014
DOI: 10.1108/ijpdlm-01-2012-0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer co-creation and the impact on intermediaries

Abstract: Purpose – While prior studies have examined how loyal customers create value for preferred manufacturers, this study aims to focus on the supply chain and captures the indirect economic and relational benefits and costs of customer value creation on channel intermediaries. Design/methodology/approach – Service-dominant logic is used to explain the rationale behind consumer contributions and supply chain connectedness in an interactive on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Siguaw et al. ). Further, the imperfect mobility of knowledge and skill‐based assets make the advantage they provide more durable to those firms holding them in comparison to more tangible resources (Barney , ; Rungtusanatham et al.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Siguaw et al. ). Further, the imperfect mobility of knowledge and skill‐based assets make the advantage they provide more durable to those firms holding them in comparison to more tangible resources (Barney , ; Rungtusanatham et al.…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Intentional value codestruction, in turn, refers to a service system intentionally misusing resources in order to gain more benefit-described as well-being-and capacity for adaptiveness for itself, to the detriment of those of another system [8]. Intentions to co-destroy or not to co-create value [8,23,36,49,50,63], opportunism or deviancy [37, 47-49, 51-54, 56], and changes in intentions [31,35,48,[55][56][57] are implied to herald value codestruction in the literature.…”
Section: Goals and Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large portion of conceptual or theoretical contribution efforts is eventual for a recently rising body of knowledge. These papers try to understand the interface between the two research fields by utilizing different constructs, like branding (Glynn, 2012; Ballantyne and Aitken, 2007), product-to-service shift (Sheth and Sharma, 2008; Spring and Araujo, 2009), value co-creation (Yazdanparast et al , 2010; Prockl et al , 2012; Stank et al , 2012; Hammervoll, 2014; Siguaw et al , 2014) or directly SDL and SCM (Flint et al , 2014; Lusch, 2011) to name a few.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%