1996
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
175
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Within mathematics education research, mathematics is often defined by a community with particular values and norms (socio-cultural perspective; e.g., D'Ambrosio, 1986), by particular kinds of constructions that ultimately depend upon the learner's mental activity (cognitive perspective; e.g., Tall, 2002), or some combination of the two (emergent perspective; e.g., Cobb & Yackel, 1996). The articles appearing in this special issue tend to focus on the cognitive perspective, though the article by Gutierrez, Brown, and Alibali, which investigates social interactions of pairs of students while they constructed knowledge, provides an example of an interdisciplinary team that blended these perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Epistemology: Problematizing Mathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within mathematics education research, mathematics is often defined by a community with particular values and norms (socio-cultural perspective; e.g., D'Ambrosio, 1986), by particular kinds of constructions that ultimately depend upon the learner's mental activity (cognitive perspective; e.g., Tall, 2002), or some combination of the two (emergent perspective; e.g., Cobb & Yackel, 1996). The articles appearing in this special issue tend to focus on the cognitive perspective, though the article by Gutierrez, Brown, and Alibali, which investigates social interactions of pairs of students while they constructed knowledge, provides an example of an interdisciplinary team that blended these perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Epistemology: Problematizing Mathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterise this relationship, Yackel and her colleagues refer to social norms as regularities in the social interaction patterns of a classroom. Cobb and Yackel (1996) argue that the norms of a classroom environment and individual students' mathematical beliefs are deeply intertwined. In particular, individuals' beliefs can be thought of as their understanding of the normative expectancies of their mathematical environment.…”
Section: Student Expectations and Beliefs About Their Roles As Mathemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because separating the output into each individual gave the false impression that insight into the children's learning processes required only data from separate individuals. One important component of a local instruction theory, however, is a description of the overarching instructional setting, which includes not only the individual children, but also the teacher, the instructional activity and materials, and the interaction between the children (Cobb & Yackel, 1996).…”
Section: Organising Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it encompasses an instructional sequence, a description of the coinciding learning processes, a description of the classroom culture, and an analysis of the proactive role of the teacher. The progression should take into account both the cognitive development of the individual students, as well as the social context (i.e., the people involved, classroom culture, and type of instruction) in which the instruction experiment is to take place (Cobb & Yackel, 1996). This implies that the outcomes of the research should not be generalised beyond this particular setting.…”
Section: Brief Introduction To Design Research In Mathematics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%