2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction quality acceptance performance-related specifications for chip seals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the chip seals in sections 2 and 3 experienced very low friction. These observations underscored the comprehensive superiority of the proposed method over previous research [13,21,40]. Further field visual inspection revealed chip seal surfaces with both very low and very high friction, as depicted in Figure 7.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the chip seals in sections 2 and 3 experienced very low friction. These observations underscored the comprehensive superiority of the proposed method over previous research [13,21,40]. Further field visual inspection revealed chip seal surfaces with both very low and very high friction, as depicted in Figure 7.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…This aspect should be highlighted and mitigated during quality control processes. Adams et al investigated the construction quality acceptance performance-related specifications for chip seals [40]. The focus of this study was to determine the so-called acceptance quality characteristics (AQCs), including emulsion-aggregate adhesive strength, aggregate gradation, emulsion application rate (EAR), and aggregate application rate (AAR), and their relationships with critical chip seal performance measures, basically aggregate loss, bleeding, or a combination of both.…”
Section: Chip Seal Quality Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%