Construction of four double gene substitution human × bovine rotavirus reassortant vaccine candidates: Each bears two outer capsid human rotavirus genes, one encoding P serotype 1A and the other encoding G serotype 1, 2, 3, or 4 specificity
Abstract:Previously, four human x bovine rotavirus reassortant candidate vaccines, each of which derived ten genes from bovine rotavirus UK strain and only the outer capsid protein VP7-gene from human rotavirus strain D (G serotype 1), DS-1 (G serotype 2), P (G serotype 3), or ST3 (G serotype 4), were developed [Midthun et al., (1985): Journal of Virology 53:949-954; (1986): Journal of Clinical Microbiology 24:822-826]. Such human x bovine reassortant vaccines should theoretically provide antigenic coverage for the fou… Show more
“…The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) UK-Compton bovine rotavirus vaccine (UK-BRV) is a multivalent bovine-human rotavirus reassortant vaccine comprised of the G6P[5] bovine rotavirus backbone with the VP7 genes from the common human rotavirus strains incorporated as reassortants into the vaccine strains [55]. The human VP7 genes for G1 (strain D), G2 (DS-1), G3 (P) and G4 (ST-3) were established first and this quadrivalent vaccine candidate was evaluated in clinical trials showing robust immune responses to the rotavirus antigens, good safety data and non-interference with the routine childhood vaccines when co-administered [56], [57].…”
Section: Development Of New Live Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine Candidatesmentioning
Rotavirus disease is a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity in children under 5years of age. The effectiveness of the two globally used oral rotavirus vaccines quickly became apparent when introduced into both developed and developing countries, with significant reductions in rotavirus-associated mortality and hospitalizations. However, the effectiveness and impact of the vaccines is reduced in developing country settings, where the burden and mortality is highest. New rotavirus vaccines, including live oral rotavirus candidates and non-replicating approaches continue to be developed, with the major aim to improve the global supply of rotavirus vaccines and for local implementation, and to improve vaccine effectiveness in developing settings. This review provides an overview of the new rotavirus vaccines in development by developing country manufacturers and provides a rationale why newer candidates continue to be explored. It describes the new live oral rotavirus vaccine candidates as well as the non-replicating rotavirus vaccines that are furthest along in development.
“…The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) UK-Compton bovine rotavirus vaccine (UK-BRV) is a multivalent bovine-human rotavirus reassortant vaccine comprised of the G6P[5] bovine rotavirus backbone with the VP7 genes from the common human rotavirus strains incorporated as reassortants into the vaccine strains [55]. The human VP7 genes for G1 (strain D), G2 (DS-1), G3 (P) and G4 (ST-3) were established first and this quadrivalent vaccine candidate was evaluated in clinical trials showing robust immune responses to the rotavirus antigens, good safety data and non-interference with the routine childhood vaccines when co-administered [56], [57].…”
Section: Development Of New Live Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine Candidatesmentioning
Rotavirus disease is a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity in children under 5years of age. The effectiveness of the two globally used oral rotavirus vaccines quickly became apparent when introduced into both developed and developing countries, with significant reductions in rotavirus-associated mortality and hospitalizations. However, the effectiveness and impact of the vaccines is reduced in developing country settings, where the burden and mortality is highest. New rotavirus vaccines, including live oral rotavirus candidates and non-replicating approaches continue to be developed, with the major aim to improve the global supply of rotavirus vaccines and for local implementation, and to improve vaccine effectiveness in developing settings. This review provides an overview of the new rotavirus vaccines in development by developing country manufacturers and provides a rationale why newer candidates continue to be explored. It describes the new live oral rotavirus vaccine candidates as well as the non-replicating rotavirus vaccines that are furthest along in development.
“…93 3.4.2 | Bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine UK-Compton bovine rotavirus (UK-BRV) is a multivalent bovinehuman rotavirus reassortant vaccine consisting of the G6P [5] backbone of bovine rotavirus with VP7 genes from common human rotavirus strains, that is G1 (strain D), G2 (DS-1), G3 (P) and G4 (ST-3). 94 This quadrivalent vaccine candidate was tested in clinical trials showing strong immune responses to rotavirus antigens, effective safety results and non-interaction with common childhood vaccines when co-administrated. 95,96 These findings led to the global production of the vaccine candidate; and the NIH developed more reassortants to include components for G8 (strain 1290) and G9…”
Section: Leb Is Present In People Of European Origin At High Frequenc...mentioning
Group A rotaviruses (RVAs) are the leading cause of gastroenteritis, causing 0.2 million deaths and several million hospitalisations globally each year. Four rotavirus vaccines (Rotarix TM , RotaTeq TM , Rotavac ® and ROTASIIL ® ) have been pre-qualified by the World Health Organization (WHO), but the two newly pre-qualified vaccines (Rotavac ® and ROTASIIL ® ) are currently only in use in Palestine and India, respectively. In 2009, WHO strongly proposed that rotavirus vaccines be included in the routine vaccination schedule of all countries around the world. By the end of 2019, a total of 108 countries had administered rotavirus vaccines, and 10 countries have currently been approved by Gavi for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine in the near future. With 39% of global coverage, rotavirus vaccines have had a substantial effect on diarrhoeal morbidity and mortality in different geographical areas, although efficacy appears to be higher in high income settings. Due to the segmented RNA genome, the pattern of RVA genotypes in the human population is evolving through interspecies transmission and/or reassortment events for which the vaccine might be less effective in the future. However, despite the relative increase in some particular genotypes after rotavirus vaccine use, the overall efficacy of rotavirus mass vaccination worldwide has not been affected. Some of the challenges to improve the effect of current rotavirus vaccines can be solved in the future by new rotavirus vaccines and by vaccines currently in progress.
“…Rotavirus outer-capsid proteins VP4 and VP7, which determine the P and G serotype specificity, respectively, induce neutralizing antibodies independently and are considered to be critical in protective immunity to rotavirus disease [25,26]. Hence, major serotypes of VP4 (P1A [8]) and/or VP7 (G1, G2, G3, and G4), which are of global epidemiological importance, have been included in candidate rotavirus vaccines [4,[27][28][29][30][31]. However, the extent of homotypic and heterotypic VP4-or VP7-specific IgA antibody responses in infants and young children who received such vaccines has not been fully delineated.…”
Homotypic and heterotypic serum isotype-specific antibody responses to rotavirus enterotoxin nonstructural protein (NSP)-4, independent neutralization antigens viral protein (VP)-4 and VP7, and group A rotavirus common antigen VP6 were analyzed by an immunocytochemistry assay in infants who received 1 of several live oral rotavirus vaccines. Significant serum immunoglobulin (Ig) A and IgG antibody responses to homotypic and/or heterotypic NSP4s of genotype [A], [B], or [C] were detected after vaccination. The magnitude of antibody responses to homotypic and heterotypic NSP4s was not significantly different, irrespective of the NSP4 genotype of the administered vaccine strain. In addition, there were no significant differences between IgA antibody responses to homotypic and heterotypic VP7s. In contrast, IgA antibody responses to VP4 were predominantly homotypic. IgA antibody responses to VP7 were lower in magnitude than those to VP4 but were comparable to those to NSP4. Antibody titers to homotypic and/or heterotypic NSP4s were positively correlated with those to VP6 before and after vaccination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.