2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction-based approach to teaching the English resultative construction to Korean EFL learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present study are in line with those of previous studies that opened the door for the application of construction grammar to language teaching (Gilquin, 2016; Herbst, 2016; Rah & Kim, 2018; Sung & Yang, 2016). Our study adds to this line of studies by offering instructional implications on the improvement of EFL learners’ sentence production ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of the present study are in line with those of previous studies that opened the door for the application of construction grammar to language teaching (Gilquin, 2016; Herbst, 2016; Rah & Kim, 2018; Sung & Yang, 2016). Our study adds to this line of studies by offering instructional implications on the improvement of EFL learners’ sentence production ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply the main ideas of the constructionist approach-the scene encoding hypothesis and the network of constructions-to facilitating second language (L2) learners' production of target constructions. Although a few attempts have sought to apply construction-based approaches to designing foreign language textbooks (Herbst, 2016) or to teaching individual constructions to L2 learners, including resultative construction (Rah & Kim, 2018;Sung & Yang, 2016) and causative construction (Gilquin, 2016), we have not found research providing multiple constructions in an interrelated network by connecting them with representational visual scenes. We believe that the application of a principled theoretical framework such as the constructionist approach to grammar instruction will shed light on the issue of how to boost EFL learners' production ability for communicative purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this model, the features of words can be compared with each other as real-valued vectors, and the basic concepts of text are not much different from later language models. Rah and Kim introduced the constrained Boltzmann machine in the natural language model, gradually modified the energy function in the basic constrained Boltzmann machine, and finally obtained the log-bilinear model [ 11 ]. Mc et al proposed a bimodal deep autoencoder to learn multimodal semantic relations by layer-by-layer training and joint features [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiding the learner's attention to the syntax–semantics interface provided by a construction can be accomplished in several ways. Teachers may present learners with sentence tokens where a variety of verbs co‐occur with a number of fixed constructions so that learners can inductively learn each construction as conventionalized expressions (e.g., Ellis & Larsen‐Freeman, ), or learners may be explicitly taught the form–meaning mappings for individual constructions (e.g., Rah & Kim, ; Sung & Yang, ). Future research investigating the role of construction‐focused instruction in L2 sentence comprehension and production will be needed to more fully assess the implications of the current findings for the integration of verbal and constructional information in L2 sentence processing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%