2016
DOI: 10.1002/bab.1467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and optimization of an efficient amplification method of a random ssDNA library by asymmetric emulsion PCR

Abstract: Construction of a random ssDNA sublibrary is an important step of the aptamer screening process. The available construction methods include asymmetric PCR, biotin–streptavidin separation, and lambda exonuclease digestions, in which PCR amplification is a key step. The main drawback of PCR amplification is overamplification increasing nonspecific hybridization among different products and by‐products, which may cause the loss of potential high‐quality aptamers, inefficient screening, and even screening failure.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functionally active nucleic acids, including aptamers [ 1 ] and single-strand oligonucleotide ligands (single stranded DNA, ssDNA), have been extensively used as target recognition elements due to their intrinsic properties. To especially carry out the ssDNA analysis, PCR amplification should be followed by the conversion of dsDNA to ssDNA using the extra steps such as asymmetric PCR [ 2 ], biotin-streptavidin separation using magnetic beads [ 3 ], enzymatic degradation, and denaturation of dsDNA by heating or by alkaline treatment, etc. [ 4 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionally active nucleic acids, including aptamers [ 1 ] and single-strand oligonucleotide ligands (single stranded DNA, ssDNA), have been extensively used as target recognition elements due to their intrinsic properties. To especially carry out the ssDNA analysis, PCR amplification should be followed by the conversion of dsDNA to ssDNA using the extra steps such as asymmetric PCR [ 2 ], biotin-streptavidin separation using magnetic beads [ 3 ], enzymatic degradation, and denaturation of dsDNA by heating or by alkaline treatment, etc. [ 4 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of conventional PCR amplification during unequal length primer PCR is that overamplification increases nonspecific hybridization among different products and by-products, which may cause the loss of potential specific aptamers, inefficient selection, and even selection failure. It was reported [ 35 ] that emulsion PCR could overcome the shortcomings of conventional PCR. During emulsion PCR, different templates are separated by emulsion particles, allowing single-molecule PCR, and avoiding nonspecific hybridization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of aPCR may be further enhanced by a method described by Tolnai et al wherein 3 phosphorylated primers ("blockers") are added to standard aPCR mixtures to minimize byproduct formation and thereby increase production yield [33]. Finally, performing aPCR in an emulsion state (a mixture of the aqueous reaction and oil) isolates DNA molecules from each other, mimicking single-molecule aPCR, and thereby reducing the formation of byproducts and increasing yield [44]. Finally, the dsDNA generated during the initial amplification cycles of aPCR can be used as a template for further ssDNA generation by aPCR, strand-specific exonuclease digestion, or chemical denaturation.…”
Section: Asymmetric Pcr (Apcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%