Aptamers are short RNA or DNA oligonucleotides which can bind with different targets. Typically, they are selected from a large number of random DNA sequence libraries. The main strategy to obtain aptamers is systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). Low efficiency is one of the limitations for conventional PCR amplification of random DNA sequence library in aptamer selection because of relative low products and high by-products formation efficiency. Here, we developed emulsion PCR for aptamer selection. With this method, the by-products formation decreased tremendously to an undetectable level, while the products formation increased significantly. Our results indicated that by-products in conventional PCR amplification were from primer-product and product-product hybridization. In emulsion PCR, we can completely avoid the product-product hybridization and avoid the most of primer-product hybridization if the conditions were optimized. In addition, it also showed that the molecule ratio of template to compartment was crucial to by-product formation efficiency in emulsion PCR amplification. Furthermore, the concentration of the Taq DNA polymerase in the emulsion PCR mixture had a significant impact on product formation efficiency. So, the results of our study indicated that emulsion PCR could improve the efficiency of SELEX.
Vascular dementia (VaD) is a syndrome of varying degrees of cognitive and memory impairment caused by cerebrovascular injury (Jia et al., 2018; Qian Wang, Yang, Zhang, Zhao, & Xu, 2020). VaD is a common form of dementia and affects millions of subjects around all the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) points out that there are currently about 35.6 million people with dementia worldwide, and the number is estimated to increase by 7.7 million annually (Xu et al., 2017). And among these dementia cases, VaD accounts for about 15%-20%, which is the second most common dementia subtype after Alzheimer's disease (AD). With the increase in human life expectancy, the number of VaD patients and the cost of treatment are expected to increase exponentially, which is attracting more
Background Aberrant DNA methylation has been firmly established as a factor contributing to the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) via its capacity to silence tumour suppressor genes. However, the methylation status of multiple tumour suppressor genes and their roles in promoting CRC metastasis are not well characterised. Methods We explored the methylation and expression profiles of CPEB1 (the gene encoding cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 1), a candidate CRC tumour suppressor gene, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and validated these results in both CRC cell lines and cells from Han Chinese CRC patients (n = 104). The functional role of CPEB1 in CRC was examined in experiments performed in vitro and in vivo. A candidate transcription factor capable of regulating CPEB1 expression was predicted in silico and validated by luciferase reporter, DNA pull-down, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Results Hypermethylation and decreased expression of CPEB1 in CRC tumour tissues were revealed by TCGA database. We also identified a significant inverse correlation (Pearson’s R = − 0.43, P < 0.001) between promoter methylation and CPEB1 expression. We validated these results in CRC samples and two CRC cell lines. We also demonstrated that up-regulation of CPEB1 resulted in significantly decreased tumour growth, migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity and promoted tumour cell apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. We identified the transcription factors CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPB) and transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2) as critical regulators of CPEB1 expression. Hypermethylation of the CPEB1 promoter resulted in a simultaneous increase in the capacity for TFCP2 binding and a decreased likelihood of CEBPB binding, both of which led to diminished expression of CPEB1. Conclusions Our results identified a novel tumour-suppressive role of CPEB1 in CRC and found that hypermethylation of the CPEB1 promoter may lead to diminished expression due to decreased chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding. Collectively, these results suggest a potential role for CPEB1 in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death, and early diagnosis of CRC could significantly reduce its mortality rate. Previous studies suggest that the DNA methylation status of zinc finger genes (ZFGs) could be of potential in CRC early diagnosis. However, the comprehensive evaluation of ZFGs in CRC is still lacking.Methods: We first collected 1,426 public samples on genome-wide DNA methylation, including 1,104 cases of CRC tumors, 54 adenomas, and 268 para-tumors. Next, the most differentially methylated ZFGs were identified and validated in two replication cohorts comprising 218 CRC patients. Finally, we compared the prediction capabilities between the ZFGs and the SEPT9 in all CRC patients and the KRAS + and KRAS- subgroup.Results: Five candidate ZFGs were selected: ESR1, ZNF132, ZNF229, ZNF542, and ZNF677. In particular, ESR1 [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91] and ZNF132 (AUC = 0.93) showed equivalent or better diagnostic capability for CRC than SEPT9 (AUC = 0.91) in the validation dataset, suggesting that these two ZFGs might be of potential for CRC diagnosis in the future. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis and found a significantly higher diagnostic capability in KRAS + (AUC ranged from 0.97 to 1) than that in KRAS- patients (AUC ranged from 0.74 to 0.86) for all these five ZFGs, suggesting that these ZFGs could be ideal diagnostic markers for KRAS mutated CRC patients.Conclusion: The methylation profiles of the candidate ZFGs could be potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of CRC, especially for patients carrying KRAS mutations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.