2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10535-011-0169-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and functional analysis of pathogen-inducible synthetic promoters in Brassica napus

Abstract: In this study, we selected two known pathogen-inducible cis-acting elements, F and E17, to construct synthetic pathogen-inducible promoters for analysis in transformed canola (Brassica napus L.). The synthetic promoter approach was used, which involved the insertion of dimers and combining two cis-acting elements (E17 and F) upstream of the minimal CaMV 35S promoter. Canola plants were transformed by three constructs, pGEE, pGFF, pGFFEE containing synthetic promoters (SP), SP-EE, SP-FF and SP-FFEE, respectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many factors that have effects on transcriptional properties of SPIP, such as cis-element function, cis-element copy number, space to TATA-box, location relative to their regulatory targets, etc. (Shokouhifar et al 2011). At present, except for the position of V-box, all other factors were exactly the same in the constructs of the three modified SPIPs (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…There are many factors that have effects on transcriptional properties of SPIP, such as cis-element function, cis-element copy number, space to TATA-box, location relative to their regulatory targets, etc. (Shokouhifar et al 2011). At present, except for the position of V-box, all other factors were exactly the same in the constructs of the three modified SPIPs (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Likewise, by coupling two cis-acting elements (E17 and F) upstream of the CaMV 35S minimal promoter, Shokouhifar et al (2011) devised synthetic plant promoters (SP-EE, SP-FF and SP-FFEE) that have high potential for use as biotrophic-sensitive and pathogen-inducible promoters in canola plants; these promoters were induced by exposure to chitin, plant defense-signaling factors and crude elicitors derived from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium graminearum pathogens. Overall, chitin induced approximately 3.5-, 1.4-and 1.6-fold increased activity in SP-FF, SP-EE and SP-FFEE, respectively, compared to untreated synthetic promoters.…”
Section: Biotic Stress-inducible Synthetic Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR product was digested with XhoI/SacI and subcloned in the pGPTV-gus int vector (Sprenger-Haussels and Weisshaar, 2000); this construct was named pG-KSgus int (Figure 1a). In the second step, the synthetic fragment containing the SP-DDEE inducible promoter sequence (Shokouhifar et al, 2011), the loxP sequence, and the nos terminator was digested with DraIII and subcloned in pG-KSgus int . The new construct was named pG-synDDEE-KSgus int ( Figure 1b).…”
Section: Construction Of Pg-synddee-cre Int -Gus Intmentioning
confidence: 99%