2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2021.3120673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and Evaluation of Robust Interpretation Models for Breast Cancer Metastasis Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Default parameters were used in all experiments, except that for LR, the L1 penalty was set to true to achieve sparse solutions due to a large number of gene features present in the dataset. Previous studies in the same dataset and similar datasets have shown that RF has consistently outperformed other classifiers in predicting breast cancer metastasis, and its performance is robust concerning parameter variations, making it a preferred choice for benchmarking [ 24 , 27 ]. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) score was used to determine the prediction accuracy of the prediction models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Default parameters were used in all experiments, except that for LR, the L1 penalty was set to true to achieve sparse solutions due to a large number of gene features present in the dataset. Previous studies in the same dataset and similar datasets have shown that RF has consistently outperformed other classifiers in predicting breast cancer metastasis, and its performance is robust concerning parameter variations, making it a preferred choice for benchmarking [ 24 , 27 ]. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) score was used to determine the prediction accuracy of the prediction models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Adnan et al [93], the authors have implemented SHAP in conjunction with LIME to explain that a small number of highly compact and biological gene cluster features resulted in similar or better performance than classifiers built with many more individual genes. With training on smaller gene clusters, LIME proved that the classifiers have better AUC than the original classifiers except in RF and rSVM.…”
Section: Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanations (Lime)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL algorithms have been successfully applied in medical imaging and disease detection, identification, and diagnosis. For example, in breast cancer, several studies have reported the utilisation, or the potential application, of automation in improving early detection and diagnosis with subsequent classification of cancer subtypes [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. DL models have also been studied in creating treatment plans for locally advanced breast cancers and predicting survival rates [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%