Construction and Analysis of Governance Evaluation Index System of Beijing Urban Subcenter Based on System Theory and Information Theory

Abstract

The construction of subcenters is considered an effective measure to solve the diseases in big cities and improve urban competitiveness. China takes the planning and construction of the Beijing urban subcenter as a major national decision-making deployment. Therefore, the establishment of a scientific and reliable evaluation index system for the urban subcenter is of great significance to the public sector to diagnose urban problems and improve urban performance management. Under the guidance of system theory, this paper establishes the governance evaluation index system of the Beijing subcenter based on the five subsystems: economic subsystem, social subsystem, cultural subsystem, ecological subsystem, and administrative subsystem, and 29 secondary indicators. After comprehensively examining the panel data of the overall Beijing urban system during the construction of the subcenter (2010–2019), the entropy method is used to objectively assign the value of the Beijing urban subcenter (Tongzhou District), and it is compared with other 15 municipal districts. The derivation of the development dynamic evolution of the Beijing urban subcenter is completed through the geospatial visualization and the linear regression fitting. It is found that the comprehensive index of urban subcenter governance in Beijing shows an upward trend year by year and has developed by leaps and bounds under the promotion of the central policy. Driven by Beijing’s subcenter strategy, the development model of the whole of Beijing has moved from a typical center diffusion model to a dual center to a subcenter and even a diversified development pattern. This paper proposes to lead urban development with the concept of high-quality development, adhere to innovation-driven, improve urban comprehensive carrying capacity through urban software and hardware construction, and realize regional coordinated development on a larger spatial scale.

Research on ecological evaluation of an enterprise open innovation community website

“…The information environment is the system itself and the natural, material, and cultural environment in which it communicates with the outside world (Wang et al. , 2017; Wang et al. , 2015).…”

“…Information technology supports the existence and operation of the system (Wang, 2021). The information environment is the system itself and the natural, material, and cultural environment in which it communicates with the outside world (Wang et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2015). Lou and Zhao (2006) believes that the information ecosystem functions as an integrated entity to facilitate information circulation and information sharing, which is formed by the interaction between information people and information ecological environment.…”

Exploring the innovation path of international social governance in the context of globalization

“…China believes that whether it is reconstructing the global governance system, building a new type of state relations including great power relations, or building a community of human destiny, the participation and cooperation of developing countries cannot be missing, and should actively promote the transformation of developing countries from passive participants in global governance to active contributors. Only developing countries and Western developed countries can actively connect and interact, break the barriers of unilateralism and narrow nationalism protection, transform global governance into collective action, and form a governance synergy [15] .…”

Study on the Role of Cultural Soft Power in International Communication

“…Specifically, it refers to the constructive power and influence on the setting of governance themes, rules of governance agenda, construction of governance platforms and creation of governance systems in the process of global affairs governance. Therefore, enhancing international discourse power and strengthening influence and control over the governance of global affairs and its direction are increasingly becoming the top priority of international competition [15] . Improving national cultural soft power can effectively enhance national influence in the international community, make other countries accept, recognize and imitate their own values, behavioral habits and policy goals, thus reducing resistance in the process of dealing with international issues, strengthening the political identity of the international community, enhancing national leadership, influence and appeal in the international community, and enhancing the right to speak in the international community.…”