Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities in broadband access

Abstract

As residential broadband options such as cable and xDSL grow in popularity, broadband providers continue to roll out service in select market areas. However, due to technological limitations, some locations qualify for xDSL broadband service while others do not. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of local geography on broadband (xDSL) network access. This type of micro-geographic analysis is important in two ways. First, a detailed analysis at the local level can reveal the spatial disparities in infrastructure access. Second, because broadband access is quickly emerging as the technology of choice for both small businesses and households, it is important to consider which locations will have opportunities for these connections and which locations will not. Utilising an integer programming model, the maximal covering location problem, and a geographic information system, xDSL broadband access is evaluated in Columbus, Ohio. Results indicate that many suburban areas can be left without adequate service. JEL classification: O0, C0

Every Little Bit Counts: The Impact of High-speed Internet on the Transition to College

“…27 In rural areas, where zip codes are much larger and less densely populated, coverage was constrained by the cost of extending additional lines long distances to reach relatively few customers (GAO, 2005). In urban areas, population density can be a problem because too many customers using a single line at once can exhaust the system (Faulhaber, 2002;Greenstein and Price, 2007;Grubesic and Murray, 2002). Thus, to be most flexible in our definition of coverage, we allowed for the possibility that geographic size may be most relevant for rural zip codes and population size may be relevant for urban zip codes.…”

“…To provide high-speed Internet, Internet service providers (ISPs) -typically the existing phone or cable company -had to make substantial infrastructure investments, retrofitting existing phone and cable lines and installing new switches and servers (Faulhaber, 2002;Greenstein and Prince, 2007;Grubesic and Murray, 2002). There is a general consensus that the costs slowed rollout and access did not keep up with consumer demand (Greenstein and Prince, 2007;Faulhaber, 2002).…”

The geographical digital divide in broadband access and governmental policies in Japan: three case studies

“…Detailed case studies in selected areas have been also carried out. In the United States, for example, Gillett and Lehr (1999) studied a county in Massachusetts, and Grubesic and Murray (2002) examined the state of Ohio. The Last Mile should be identified as a new issue in the geographical digital divide of the broadband age.…”

Public Health, GIS, and the Internet

“…Robust public health GIS Internet interoperability will depend on consensus approaches to dynamic exploration of occurring statistically complex space-time data, satellite data delivery and mobile geoprocessing (107), distributed data mining (98), advanced forms of wireless communications (30, 47,50), and data sharing and publishing within accepted standards of data security and privacy. Dataintensive applications will be designed to exploit the high bandwidth provided by emerging domestic and international networks so that multigigabyte, even terabyte, data sets can be remotely explored in real time (21).…”