2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c16287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Ni12P5/Ni2P Heterostructures to Boost Interfacial Polarization for Enhanced Microwave Absorption Performance

Abstract: Heterostructures with a rich phase boundary are attractive for surface-mediated microwave absorption (MA) materials. However, understanding the MA mechanisms behind the heterogeneous interface remains a challenge. Herein, a phosphine (PH3) vapor-assisted phase and structure engineering strategy was proposed to construct three-dimensional (3D) porous Ni12P5/Ni2P heterostructures as microwave absorbers and explore the role of the heterointerface in MA performance. The results indicated that the heterogeneous int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 13 ] Herein, we deliberately compared our Ni 2 P‐Ni 12 P 5 @Ni 3 S 2 /NF with another reference samples prepared by tuning the sodium hypophosphite amount, which exhibited different content ratios of Ni 2 P and Ni 12 P 5 , and accordingly changeable interface length (amount) (details in Experimental Section, Figure S42, and Table S1, Supporting Information). [ 68 ] Interestingly, our targeted sample Ni 2 P‐Ni 12 P 5 @Ni 3 S 2 /NF (prepared with moderate 0.25 g of sodium hypophosphite) exhibited the best activity in all electrolytes, which could be due to the optimum balance between the interfacial coupling and surface morphology (details in Figures S43 and S44, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] Herein, we deliberately compared our Ni 2 P‐Ni 12 P 5 @Ni 3 S 2 /NF with another reference samples prepared by tuning the sodium hypophosphite amount, which exhibited different content ratios of Ni 2 P and Ni 12 P 5 , and accordingly changeable interface length (amount) (details in Experimental Section, Figure S42, and Table S1, Supporting Information). [ 68 ] Interestingly, our targeted sample Ni 2 P‐Ni 12 P 5 @Ni 3 S 2 /NF (prepared with moderate 0.25 g of sodium hypophosphite) exhibited the best activity in all electrolytes, which could be due to the optimum balance between the interfacial coupling and surface morphology (details in Figures S43 and S44, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM absorption performance could be intuitively evaluated by reflection loss (RL), and the RL was calculated according to the transmission line theory as: where Z in is the normalized input impedance of the absorber, Z 0 is the impedance of free space, f is the frequency of the EM wave, d is the thickness of the absorber, and c is the velocity of light in free space [ 9 , 47 ]. Specifically, the RL value should be lower than -10 dB, and more than 90% of the incident EM waves will be attenuated [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is significant to study the RCS of the material coating corresponding to different incident angles of EM waves. 45 As shown in Figure 7, the HFSS technology is employed to simulate RCS values of the MF composite coatings under different incident angles. As shown in Figure 7a, the RCS values of PEC and MF-9 are basically coincidental and are larger than other composite coatings, indicating that MF-6, MF-7, and MF-8 coatings have great contribution on EM wave attenuations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practical application scenarios, especially aircrafts, it is necessary to face EM waves with different incident angles. Therefore, it is significant to study the RCS of the material coating corresponding to different incident angles of EM waves . As shown in Figure , the HFSS technology is employed to simulate RCS values of the MF composite coatings under different incident angles.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%