2021
DOI: 10.5194/wes-6-15-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing fast and representative analytical models of wind turbine main bearings

Abstract: Abstract. This paper considers the modelling of wind turbine main bearings using analytical models. The validity of simplified analytical representations used in existing work is explored by comparing main-bearing force reactions with those obtained from higher-fidelity 3D finite-element models. Results indicate that there is good agreement between the analytical and 3D models in the case of a non-moment-reacting support (such as for double-row spherical roller bearings), but the same does not hold in the mome… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies all considered only the case of a non-moment reacting support at the main-bearing, a condition that generally holds for a double-row spherical roller bearing (SRB) in a three-point mounting configuration but does not hold for paired tapered roller bearings (TRBs) which, as a unit, provide a combination of force and moment reactions to applied loads. Stirling et al (2021) proposed an extension of the preceding analytical main-bearing representations that accounts for moment reactions via inclusion of rotational springs.…”
Section: Main-bearing Modelling and Load Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies all considered only the case of a non-moment reacting support at the main-bearing, a condition that generally holds for a double-row spherical roller bearing (SRB) in a three-point mounting configuration but does not hold for paired tapered roller bearings (TRBs) which, as a unit, provide a combination of force and moment reactions to applied loads. Stirling et al (2021) proposed an extension of the preceding analytical main-bearing representations that accounts for moment reactions via inclusion of rotational springs.…”
Section: Main-bearing Modelling and Load Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing fatigue life standards are reaching their limit for calculating main bearing rating life due to low operational speeds, high axial loads, and lubrication characteristics, especially as tall land-based and offshore turbines continue to increase in size. These types of failures can be better understood through both accelerated benchtop as well as full-scale investigations supported by modeling (Sethuraman, Guo, and Sheng 2015;Stirling, Hart, and Kazemi Amiri 2021;Guo et al 2021). The aim of this work should be to help identify root causes and make better-informed initial design and maintenance decisions .…”
Section: Main Bearing Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done using the statically determinate single main-bearing model previously used in Hart et al (2019); Hart (2020); Stirling et al (2021) and discussed in Section 2. As described earlier, evaluation of main-bearing applied loading involves a static load balance at each timestep.…”
Section: Generating the "Contact Conditions Dataset"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main-bearing research to-date has mainly focused on load modelling (Kock et al, 2019;Hart, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2020a;Stirling et al, 2021), load characteristics (Cardaun et al, 2019;Hart et al, 2019;Hart, 2020;Guo et al, 2021) and implications for fatigue damage (Zheng et al, 2020b;Loriemi et al, 2021). Lubrication conditions within the main-bearing are generally not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation