Constructing common ground and re‐creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes

Abstract

Multi‐actor initiatives aiming at environmental sustainability and social equity, face complex tensions between institutionalized decision‐makers, backed up by expert knowledge, and communities with locally embedded knowledge and interests. Despite the importance given to community participation, successful experiences are limited in number, scope and duration. Experts are confronted with the paradox that they exclude local communities with the strategies and languages they use to include them.This study is based on the long‐term experiences of the authors with a multi‐actor initiative in southern Ecuador on sustainable rural drinking water management. They were involved as action‐researchers, facilitating multiparty interactions and supporting reflective practice among the participants.The article shows how multiparty processes construct identities, workforms, structures and activities that cross the boundaries between communities of expert and indigenous practice, even in the exceptionally unequal conditions of the Andes, where inequalities between these communities are deeply rooted in history. Such transitions were taken as opportunities to look for common ground between different communities‐of‐practice whilst, at the same time, contradictions could come to the fore. As inequalities tend to be confirmed through interactions, not only inside but also outside the multi‐actor initiative, they cannot be resolved definitively by a multiparty project. Under those circumstances a social constructionist approach, calling the attention to the constructed nature of mutual perceptions and relationships, was highly inspiring for the authors‐facilitators to keep the reflection and dialogue among the participants in the process going‐on. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management?

“…Facilitators may offer special support to stakeholders who are less well endowed with verbal skills, financial resources and other resources (Craps et al 2004). This may also be in the interest of the stronger stakeholders.…”

“…Yet, in cases of mutual interdependence, social learning is the only satisfactory approach in the long run. There are several cases where social learning did work, including cases where interests conflicted and relations were initially mediocre or absent (Craps et al 2004). …”

Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together

“…Including a diversity of stakeholders means dealing with disparities in power and resources (Dewulf et al, 2005;Craps et al, 2004;Wenger, 1998 Knowledge has different political valences. Natural scientific knowledge is afforded the status of ''hard'' science, with strong characteristics of predictability, generalizability, verifiability and reproducibility.…”

Transboundary Dialogue and Cooperation: First Lessons from Igniting Negotiations on Joint Management of the Mayombe Forest in the Congo Basin

“…In the Mayombe project, these phases are described on table 1. A similar framework brings different actors together and integrates frames in one perspective or solution [10]. Within the Mayombe project, integrating frames in one perspective is concretized by signed documents to indicate commitment and engagement by the diverse group of stakeholders.…”