Construcción de la Escala de Factores Personales de Resiliencia (FPR-1) en mujeres víctimas del desplazamiento forzado en Colombia

Abstract

r e s u m e n La escala FPR-1 se desarrolló con el fin de analizar los factores personales de resiliencia en un grupo de 113 mujeres desplazadas por la violencia en Colombia. Para esto, se llevó a cabo un estudio cuantitativo, explicativo, de corte psicométrico. El análisis factorial de la Escala señala la presencia de 13 factores latentes en torno a los cuales se organiza la información. Se encontró que las mujeres más resilientes son las adultas intermedias, seguidas de las mujeres mayores, mientras que las mujeres jóvenes tienden a la inconsistencia. Se destaca que la presencia de actitudes resilientes es explicada especialmente en relación con el altruismo y la apertura a los demás.Palabras clave resiliencia; desplazamiento forzado; enfoque de género a b s t r a C t The PRF-1 scale was developed to analyze the personal factors of resilience in a group of 113 women displaced by violence in Colombia. For this we conducted a psychometric cutting, quantitative and explanatory study. Factor analysis of the scale indicates the presence of 13 latent factors around which the information is organized. We found out that women are more resilient at intermediate and older age, while young women are inconsistent. It's note that the presence of resilient attitudes is explained especially in relation to altruism and openness to others.

Hidden Resilience in the Life of Adolescents with Involvement in Drug Trafficking

“…The use of scales in resilience research has been critiqued by some scholars (Reppold, Mayer, Almeida, & Hutz, 2012), creating a lack of consensus regarding if and how resilience can be measured through the use of scales, as occurs in other psychological studies. Some of the scientific material available for inquiring into possible indicators of resilience in individuals and groups tend to highlight features that are still centered on individuals' characteristics and personality traits (Amar, Utria, Llanos, González, & Romero, 2014;Cardoso, 2013). Beyond a polarized discussion between disadvantages and potentialities in the use of quantitative instruments in the study of resilience, various scholars have argued that such procedures, including the use of scales, questionnaires or any other technique, must be based on clear epistemic models, reflecting how constructs are understood and evidencing the conceptual bases supporting the proposed research.…”