2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on water vapor vertical distribution at the Phoenix landing site during summer from MGS TES day and night observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Phoenix measurements showed no significant difference in H 2 O abundance between 9 h and 16 h (Smith et al, 2009b). Moreover, recent remote-sensing studies by MEX/SPICAM and MGS/TES show that local time variation of total H 2 O column is small at this season (e.g., Pankine and Tamppari, 2015;Trokhimovskiy et al, 2015). The systematic error in the HDO/H 2 O ratio can be estimated to be less than $10%.…”
Section: Latitude [Degrees]mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, Phoenix measurements showed no significant difference in H 2 O abundance between 9 h and 16 h (Smith et al, 2009b). Moreover, recent remote-sensing studies by MEX/SPICAM and MGS/TES show that local time variation of total H 2 O column is small at this season (e.g., Pankine and Tamppari, 2015;Trokhimovskiy et al, 2015). The systematic error in the HDO/H 2 O ratio can be estimated to be less than $10%.…”
Section: Latitude [Degrees]mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…He concluded that in northern summer, the mixing ratio was 150 ppm and that the column was well mixed, stating specifically that water confined to the lowest 1–2 km was inconsistent with his data. Savijärvi [], also modeling the VL1 site in summertime, found that the column was well mixed to at least 3 km as late as 22:00 h. Tamppari et al [] and Pankine and Tamppari [] both conclude that water vapor is progressively concentrated near the base of the atmosphere as northern summer wanes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we have chosen the simplest approximation: that there is no diurnal variation. A diurnal variation of 10-20%, as in (Pankine and Tamppari, 2015) would not change any of the main findings of this work, including the location and seasonality of the "humid zones". If we look at GCM derived column water vapor, the change from day to night is indeed small (less than 10%).…”
Section: Validation Of Tes Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 62%