2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONSTRAINTS ON THE ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION AND VARIABILITY OF THE ECCENTRIC HOT JUPITER XO-3b

Abstract: We report secondary eclipse photometry of the hot Jupiter XO-3b in the 4.5 µm band taken with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope. We measure individual eclipse depths and center of eclipse times for a total of twelve secondary eclipses. We fit these data simultaneously with two transits observed in the same band in order to obtain a global best-fit secondary eclipse depth of 0.1580 ± 0.0036% and a center of eclipse phase of 0.67004 ± 0.00013. We assess the relative magnitude of var… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
63
3
Order By: Relevance
“…−4 days −1 (Wong et al 2014). Here we compare our results with the ones reported in Wong et al (2014).…”
Section: -+ ×10mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…−4 days −1 (Wong et al 2014). Here we compare our results with the ones reported in Wong et al (2014).…”
Section: -+ ×10mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The eclipse depth is defined as the (unseen) planetʼs flux at the center of eclipse, in units of stellar flux (see Figure 1). When fitting the eclipse models, the orbital parameters are fixed to the values reported in Table 2, taken from Wong et al (2014), while the center of eclipse, eclipse depth, and phase constant are free parameters to determine. We also considered models with zero phase curveʼs slope (see Appendix A.5).…”
Section: The Eclipse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tried decorrelating instrumental noise in our data using pixel mapping (e.g., Ballard et al 2010;Lewis et al 2013;Wong et al 2014). This nonparametric technique constructs an empirical map of the pixel response across the chip by comparing the measured flux from each image to those of other images with similar stellar positions.…”
Section: Instrumental Noise Model and Optimal Aperture Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also directly compare the performance of PLD for cases where we fit to either the unbinned or optimally binned photometry, as well as to the fit acquired from photometry using the Wong et al (2014) pixel mapping technique described in the previous paragraph. We find thatthe optimally binned PLD haslower levels of correlated noise than the other methods ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Instrumental Noise Model and Optimal Aperture Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus they can tell us about the dynamics of giant-planet atmospheres (e.g., Wong et al 2014 and references therein).…”
Section: A Massive Planet In An Eccentric Orbitmentioning
confidence: 99%