2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-03795-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints handling in combinatorial interaction testing using multi-objective crow search and fruitfly optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid of multi-objective crow search and fruitfly optimization has been studied and offers an optimal selection of the test suites at a fairly good convergence rate [12]. Haslinger et al [13] applied a Simulated Annealing algorithm to generate t-wise covering array and demonstrated a tool to improve the performance of SPL testing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid of multi-objective crow search and fruitfly optimization has been studied and offers an optimal selection of the test suites at a fairly good convergence rate [12]. Haslinger et al [13] applied a Simulated Annealing algorithm to generate t-wise covering array and demonstrated a tool to improve the performance of SPL testing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its proposed, it has received extensive attention and been applied in some areas of optimization like economic dispatch problems [135], feature selection problems [136], and so on. The authors found CSA metaheuristic has been introduced around combinatorial tway testing [137].…”
Section: Swarm-based Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, many evolutionary and heuristic approaches are proposed. In particle swam optimization (PSO), the fitness value of all particles is optimized, and it is like flock of birds every bird in the flock moves in the same direction of its neighbor (Ramgouda and Chandraprakash, 2019). Each bird is associated with a velocity with which it is moving.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%