Constraints for emotion specificity in fear and anger: The context counts

Abstract

We investigated psychophysiological responses to fear and anger inductions during real-life and imagination. Female participants (N = 158) were assigned to a fear-treatment, fear-control, anger-treatment, or anger-control group. Context (real-life, imagination) was varied in two sessions of fixed order. Eleven self-report and 29 somatovisceral variables were registered. Results showed that (a) except during anger imagination, control groups were emotionless; (b) in control groups, contexts prompted diverging somatovisceral responses, but similar emotion self-reports; except during fear imagination, the emotion inductions (c) were successful and (d) produced specific emotion reports; (e) during real-life, somatovisceral fear and anger responses exhibited a marked cardiovascular defense reflex; (f) in addition, real-life fear showed an adrenaline-like specific response pattern, whereas real-life anger showed specific forehead temperature and EMG extensor increases, accompanied by an elevated DBP during imagination. A Component Model of Somatovisceral Response Organization is proposed.

The Psychology of Fear of Crime. Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives

“…1 Development of dispositional fear of crime dependent on personal prerequisites and experiences of episodes of fear behaviour in such a broad sense would not be an indication of fear because it would not be an indication of anything. It may well be that a set of typical physical patterns turns out to be characteristic of fear (Stemmler et al 2001). It is unlikely, however, that such patterns will ever be characteristic (let alone indicative) of fear of crime.…”

Capturing emotion reactivity through physiology measurement as a foundation for affective engineering in engineering design science and engineering practices

“…He proposes a variety of distinct "visible ANS-mediated changes in emotion" (Levenson 2003(Levenson , 2014. Several other studies support this approach to measuring the autonomic specificity of emotion (Ax 1953;Stemmler 1989;Christie and Friedman 2004;Stemmler et al 2001;Ekman et al 1983). Shiota et al (2011) proposed providing "evidence of differences in autonomic nervous system responding associated with multiple positive emotions, such as enthusiasm, love (attachment), love (nurturant), and awe."…”

Ipra—enhancing the Sensing Abilities of Ambient Intelligence

“…The second data set we considered in our application of IPRA comprised psychophysiological signals collected by Stemmler et al (2001). In their experiment Stemmler and colleagues collected psychophysiological data related to heart activity, respiratory activity, muscle activity, skin conductance, and skin temperature during several experimental phases.…”

“…The Data. From the measured signals, twenty-nine physiological indicators like heart rate, blood pressure, skin conductance, and forehead temperature were available for each participant in each phase (for a more detailed description of the indicators see Stemmler et al 2001). As a result, three measurements of dimension twenty-nine collected during phases of induced anger existed for each subject.…”

“…Because physiological signals of different persons usually differ considerably from each other even when the persons report experiencing the same (intensity of) emotion, we included a unique identification for each participant as an additional dimension into the data set. , 15, 20, 44, 49, 65, 73, and 94 of the Experiment by Stemmler et al (2001) Consequently, the data set finally analyzed consisted of forty-eight measurements with thirty dimensions each. Although compared to the EEG data these are few dimensions, the curse of dimensionality can still be expected to be a major problem also with this data set, as the number of measurements is low and, in particular, considerably below the amount of 600 measurements which would be required to avoid the curse (Jain et al 2000).…”