2006
DOI: 10.5191/jiaee.2006.13103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints and Strategies toward Effective Cost-sharing of Agricultural Technology Delivery in Nigeria: Perception of Farmers and Agricultural Extension Personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study by Ozor et al (2013) also reported that majority of farmers in Nigeria (95.1%) were willing to pay for improved extension services irrespective of their poor income status so long as the extension services remained relevant to their felt needs. In a similar study, Chukwuone et al (2006) found out that one of the most effective strategies through which farmers can pay for the cost of private extension services is through the farmers' cooperative societies. Figure 2 illustrates the frequency of contracted extension services that farmers ranked top three most effective for value chain development.…”
Section: Changes In Accessing Contracted Extension Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study by Ozor et al (2013) also reported that majority of farmers in Nigeria (95.1%) were willing to pay for improved extension services irrespective of their poor income status so long as the extension services remained relevant to their felt needs. In a similar study, Chukwuone et al (2006) found out that one of the most effective strategies through which farmers can pay for the cost of private extension services is through the farmers' cooperative societies. Figure 2 illustrates the frequency of contracted extension services that farmers ranked top three most effective for value chain development.…”
Section: Changes In Accessing Contracted Extension Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor loading high under each factor variable (Beta weight) represents a correlation of variables to the identified factors and has the same interpretation as any correlation coefficient. However, only variables with loading of 0.40 and above (10% overlapping variance), (Chukwuone et al, 2006) were used in naming factors. Also factors that loaded in more than one places were discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor loading high under each factor variable (Beta weight) represents a correlation of variables to the identified factors and has the same interpretation as any correlation coefficient. However, only variables with loading of 0.40 and above (10% overlapping variance) (Comrey in Chukwuone et al, 2006) were used in naming factors. Also factors that loaded in more than one places were discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%