2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the mass and radius of neutron stars in globular clusters

Abstract: We analyze observations of eight quiescent low-mass X-ray binaries in globular clusters and combine them to determine the neutron star mass-radius curve and the equation of state of dense matter. We determine the effect that several uncertainties may have on our results, including uncertainties in the distance, the atmosphere composition, the neutron star maximum mass, the neutron star mass distribution, the possible presence of a hotspot on the neutron star surface, and the prior choice for the equation of st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
128
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
14
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of the gravitational wave (GW) signal GW170817 [1] by the LIGO [2] and Virgo [3] detectors, followed by electromagnetic (EM) observations [4], opens up the possibility of multi-messenger astronomy as a probe of ultra-dense matter on the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) phase diagram. Estimates of the tidal properties of the binary neutron star (BNS) source of GW170817 [5,6] are inconsistent with too stiff hadronic matter, and lead to NS radii that are consistent with previous X-ray binary observations [7][8][9][10]. With further future BNS detections and improved detector sensitivity [11], GW observations will yield stringent constraints on the NS interior properties [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] that are expected to encounter smaller systematic uncertainties than those from X-ray binaries [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The detection of the gravitational wave (GW) signal GW170817 [1] by the LIGO [2] and Virgo [3] detectors, followed by electromagnetic (EM) observations [4], opens up the possibility of multi-messenger astronomy as a probe of ultra-dense matter on the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) phase diagram. Estimates of the tidal properties of the binary neutron star (BNS) source of GW170817 [5,6] are inconsistent with too stiff hadronic matter, and lead to NS radii that are consistent with previous X-ray binary observations [7][8][9][10]. With further future BNS detections and improved detector sensitivity [11], GW observations will yield stringent constraints on the NS interior properties [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] that are expected to encounter smaller systematic uncertainties than those from X-ray binaries [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For mass and radius we also imposed a more informed prior based on the models of Steiner et al (2018), who used observations of eight quiescent low mass X-ray binaries in globular clusters to determine the neutron star mass-radius curve and the equation of state. Steiner et al (2018) used a fixed mass grid and varied radius according to their chosen equation of state and observations of radii. We chose the simplest of their models ('baseline') and used the probability distribution given in Figure 2.4 for the relationship between mass and radius.…”
Section: Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steiner et al (2018) probability distribution for NS radius as a function of mass based on observations of low mass X-ray binaries in globular clusters. Contour levels shown are 1σ intervals up to 5σ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These other studies, however, are either based on a small set of individual EOSs (see, e.g., Refs. [13][14][15]), interpret observational data in a way that contains modeling uncertainties [16][17][18][19][20], or apply Bayesian inference to assess the credence of different EOSs based on a theoretical prior [16,[18][19][20]. Some exceptions to this are the works of Hebeler et al, which extrapolates a CET EOS to higher densities [21], and Kurkela et al [6] and Gorda [22], which additionally include a PQCD constraint at high density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%