2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach to matching thermonuclear X-ray burst observations with models

Abstract: We present a new method of matching observations of Type I (thermonuclear) X-ray bursts with models, comparing the predictions of a semi-analytic ignition model with X-ray observations of the accretion-powered millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4-3658 in outburst. We used a Bayesian analysis approach to marginalise over the parameters of interest and determine parameters such as fuel composition, distance/anisotropy factors, neutron star mass and neutron star radius. Our study includes a treatment of the system incl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, from theory, we expect that the scale of our count-rate dependent bias should be b=−1.09, which is offset by about 20% from the b=−0.87 that we actually measured using our flux-adjusted phase model (Table 1). This offset can be accounted for by changing the assumed neutron star mass ( M 2  ), radius (8 km), and distance (3.8 kpc) (Galloway & Cumming 2006;Hartman et al 2008;Goodwin et al 2019a), but only if m <1.2 10 G cm 26 3 (see Figure 6). The magnetic moment of SAXJ1808 has been constrained to -0.7 1.4 10 G cm 26 3 ( ) (Hartman et al 2008;.…”
Section: Hot-spot Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, from theory, we expect that the scale of our count-rate dependent bias should be b=−1.09, which is offset by about 20% from the b=−0.87 that we actually measured using our flux-adjusted phase model (Table 1). This offset can be accounted for by changing the assumed neutron star mass ( M 2  ), radius (8 km), and distance (3.8 kpc) (Galloway & Cumming 2006;Hartman et al 2008;Goodwin et al 2019a), but only if m <1.2 10 G cm 26 3 (see Figure 6). The magnetic moment of SAXJ1808 has been constrained to -0.7 1.4 10 G cm 26 3 ( ) (Hartman et al 2008;.…”
Section: Hot-spot Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is mentioned in Section 1, PRE models are not the only pathway to the distances of type I X-ray bursters. Bayesian inference based on a burst ignition model (Cumming & Bildsten 2000) was recently realised to estimate parameters including X and D (Goodwin et al 2019). We believe such inferences will be made for more type I X-ray bursters in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hereafter, we refer to this spherically symmetric model as the simplistic PRE model, and the simplistic-PRE-model-based PRE distances as nominal PRE distances. Besides PRE models, a Bayesian framework has been recently developed to infer parameters, including the distance and the composition of nuclear fuel on the NS surface, for the type I X-ray burster SAX J1808.4-3658 (Goodwin et al 2019), by matching the burst observables (such as burst flux and recurrence time) of non-PRE type I X-ray bursts with the prediction from a burst ignition model (Cumming & Bildsten 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the accretion-powered millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4−3658 [3,4] that powered up the brightest Type-I X-ray burst (XRB) recorded by NICER in recent history [5]. The first 1D multi-zone model of SAX J1808.4−3658 was recently constructed [6,7]. The pioneering model offers a first concurrent and direct comparison with the observed light curves, fluences, and recurrence times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A close match of modeled and observed PRE burst permit us to probe the complicated burst mechanism of PRE bursters. Johnston et al [6] recently constructed the first PRE burst model quantitatively describing the accretion-powered millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4−3658, whereas the other simplified model built by Goodwin et al [7] provides an intuitive grasp of the observables of SAX J1808.4−3658 burster. The host neutron star of this PRE burster spins up to millisecond periods by the accretion of stellar matter from a low-mass companion star in its X-ray binary system [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%