2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the invisible neutrino decay with KM3NeT-ORCA

Abstract: Several theories of particle physics beyond the Standard Model consider that neutrinos can decay. In this work we assume that the standard mechanism of neutrino oscillations is altered by the decay of the heaviest neutrino mass state into a sterile neutrino and, depending on the model, a scalar or a Majoron. We study the sensitivity of the forthcoming KM3NeT-ORCA experiment to this scenario and find that it could improve the current bounds coming from oscillation experiments, where three-neutrino oscillations … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[38] here we consider that only the two neutrinos that participate in the decay process are interacting. In addition, we explore the possible degeneracies between a finite neutrino lifetime and a variation in N eff , and show that contrary to previous expectations [39,50,51] even if only one neutrino species decays and a non-interacting N eff is allowed to vary, neutrino lifetimes of τ ν < 0.9 × 10 9 s (m ν /0.05 eV) 3 are still excluded at 95% CL by Planck CMB observations. Finally, we find that when including Planck 2015 high-polarization data in the analysis, neutrino lifetimes in the range τ ν = (2 − 14) × 10 9 s (m ν /0.05 eV) 3 are preferred over neutrinos being purely stable with a ∼ 1-2 σ significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[38] here we consider that only the two neutrinos that participate in the decay process are interacting. In addition, we explore the possible degeneracies between a finite neutrino lifetime and a variation in N eff , and show that contrary to previous expectations [39,50,51] even if only one neutrino species decays and a non-interacting N eff is allowed to vary, neutrino lifetimes of τ ν < 0.9 × 10 9 s (m ν /0.05 eV) 3 are still excluded at 95% CL by Planck CMB observations. Finally, we find that when including Planck 2015 high-polarization data in the analysis, neutrino lifetimes in the range τ ν = (2 − 14) × 10 9 s (m ν /0.05 eV) 3 are preferred over neutrinos being purely stable with a ∼ 1-2 σ significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the remaining rotations, we have in general 12 angles and 12 phases. However, in our numerical studies we will limit ourselves to two phases only, namely δ 13 and δ 16 . This means that the mixing matrix above can be reduced tõ…”
Section: Quasi-dirac Neutrino Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in Chapter 8 we turn our attention to atmospheric neutrinos at the next generation experiment ORCA. There, we study the sensitivity of the experiment to the invisible neutrino decay [16], which can be present, for example, in Majoron models, relating neutrino physics with the physics of dark matter. We will close with a few final remarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutrino oscillation is caused by slight differences between neutrino masses (squared masses), which are already small in themselves, and the lack of coincidence between neutrino mass eigenstates and flavor eigenstates [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The long-distance interferometry characteristic of neutrino oscillations, in addition to their energy dependency, allows us to test subleading effects that can be produced by a variety of beyond standard oscillation physics such as nonstandard interaction [10][11][12][13][14], neutrino decay [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], quantum decoherence [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], among others [32][33][34]. Nowadays, we are moving toward a neutrino oscillation physics precision era which implies that our sensitivity for performing searches for signatures from nonstandard physics would be increased as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%