2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2014)077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining $ \mathcal{N} $ = 1 supergravity inflationary framework with non-minimal Kähler operators

Abstract: In this paper we will illustrate how to constrain unavoidable Kähler corrections for N = 1 supergravity (SUGRA) inflation from the recent Planck data. We will show that the non-renormalizable Kähler operators will induce in general non-minimal kinetic term for the inflaton field, and two types of SUGRA corrections in the potential -the Hubbleinduced mass (c H ), and the Hubble-induced A-term (a H ) correction. The entire SUGRA inflationary framework can now be constrained from (i) the speed of sound, c s , and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus increasing the GB coupling beyond a value leads to instability. Hence, in the perturbative regime of the solution we can always obtain a stabilized modulus potential although these stabilized values of the modulus radius r c are not effective in resolving the gauge hierarchy or fine-tuning problem as k M r c ≪ O (12). We observe that as S goes beyond the value ∼ 0.9 the minimum of the potential disappears and we move to the region of instability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus increasing the GB coupling beyond a value leads to instability. Hence, in the perturbative regime of the solution we can always obtain a stabilized modulus potential although these stabilized values of the modulus radius r c are not effective in resolving the gauge hierarchy or fine-tuning problem as k M r c ≪ O (12). We observe that as S goes beyond the value ∼ 0.9 the minimum of the potential disappears and we move to the region of instability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Usually such corrections originate naturally in string theory where power expansion in terms of inverse of Regge slope (or string tension) yields the higher curvature corrections to pure Einstein's gravity. Supergravity, as the low energy limit [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] of heterotic string theory [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], yields the Gauss-Bonnet (GB) term along with dilaton coupling at the leading order correction. Consequently it became an active area of interest as a modified theory of gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a mass term generically arises via a Plancksuppressed interaction in the framework of supergravity [32]; see also [3,[5][6][7]. Since the value of the coefficient c depends on the details of the Kähler terms [33], it is fair to treat it as a free parameter to keep the discussion model independent. According to its value, we may consider the following three possibilities:…”
Section: Supergravity Correction and The Evolution Of Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However such quantum corrections are extremely hard to compute as it completely belongs to the hidden sector of the theory dominated by heavy fields [21,22]. In the trans-Planckian regime the classical gravity sector is corrected by incorporating the effect of higher derivative interactions appearing through the modifications to GR which plays significant role in this context [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: The Effective Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%